Effectiveness for self-monitoring of blood sugar on blood glucose control in Turkish patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

dc.contributor.authorBaltacı, Davut
dc.contributor.authorKutlucan, Ali
dc.contributor.authorÖztürk, Serkan
dc.contributor.authorSarıtaş, Ayhan
dc.contributor.authorÇeler, Ahmet
dc.contributor.authorCelbek, Gökhan
dc.contributor.authorAnkaralı, Handan
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-01T09:11:50Z
dc.date.available2020-05-01T09:11:50Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.departmentDÜ, Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümüen_US
dc.descriptionAnkarali, Handan Camdeviren/0000-0002-3613-0523; Saritas, Ayhan/0000-0002-4302-1093; Saritas, Ayhan/0000-0002-4302-1093en_US
dc.descriptionWOS: 000307479600006en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed: 22926352en_US
dc.description.abstractAim Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a chronic disease requiring continuous monitoring and treatment. Self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) is frequently recommended. The purpose of the study was to evaluate effectiveness of SMBG on metabolic control in Turkish patients with type 2 DM. Methods The cross-sectional study enrolled type 2 diabetic patients without insulin regimen. The participants were assigned to three groups according to status of SMBG: group 1- regular, group 2 - irregular and group 3 - never SMBG implementation. Results A total of 349 patients were enrolled. There was no significant difference in mean fasting and post-prandial blood glucose, lipid profile values between the groups. The number of patients with high education level in group 1 was higher than groups 2 and 3 (p = 0.001). HbA1c level was higher in groups 2 and 3 than group I, but not significantly (p = 0.285). Mean spot urinary albumin-creatinine ratio (ACR) in group I is significantly lower than in groups 2 and 3 (p = 0.008 and p = 0.044, respectively), but no significant difference was observed between group 2 and 3 (p = 0.473). Conclusion The study indicated that regular use of SMBG was not superior to irregular/never use of SMBG on glycemic control, but it seemed to be good intervention for prevention of diabetic nephropathy. We suggestively offered that SMBG should be recommended for patients with a high education level to meet the goal of its use, and it should be incorporated into self-management with effective educational intervention.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage217en_US
dc.identifier.issn1840-0132
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ4en_US
dc.identifier.startpage211en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12684/5785
dc.identifier.volume9en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000307479600006en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMedical Assoc Zenicadoboj Cantonen_US
dc.relation.ispartofMedicinski Glasniken_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectHbA1cen_US
dc.subjectDiabetes Mellitusen_US
dc.subjectAlbumin-creatinine ratioen_US
dc.subjectGlycemic controlen_US
dc.titleEffectiveness for self-monitoring of blood sugar on blood glucose control in Turkish patients with type 2 diabetes mellitusen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim
İsim:
5785.pdf
Boyut:
1.45 MB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin / Full Text