Turkish adaptation of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Symptom Score and its validity and reliability

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorÖzengin, Nuriye
dc.contributor.authorKaya, Serap
dc.contributor.authorOrhan, Ceren
dc.contributor.authorBakar, Yeşim
dc.contributor.authorDuran, Bülent
dc.contributor.authorAnkaralı, Handan
dc.contributor.authorAkbayrak, Türkan
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-30T23:46:49Z
dc.date.available2020-04-30T23:46:49Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.departmentDÜ, Tıp Fakültesi, Temel Tıp Bilimleri Bölümüen_US
dc.descriptionAnkarali, Handan Camdeviren/0000-0002-3613-0523en_US
dc.descriptionWOS: 000405791100015en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed: 28062904en_US
dc.description.abstractIntroduction and hypothesis The purpose of this study was to adapt the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Symptom Score (POP-SS) into Turkish and evaluate its reliability and validity. Methods The POP-SS was adapted into Turkish by following the steps of the intercultural adaptation process. One hundred and three women with symptomatic or asymptomatic pelvic organ prolapse (POP) completed the Turkish POP-SS and other valid and reliable Turkish tools for POP: Pelvic Organ Prolapse Distress Inventory 6 (POPDI-6), Colorectal-Anal Distress Inventory 8 (CRADI-8), Urinary Distress Inventory 6 (UDI-6), Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory 20 (PFDI-20), and Pelvic Organ Prolapse Impact Questionnaire 7 (POPIQ-7). Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) system was also used to assess pelvic support, and patients were divided into three groups based on POP-Q scores. Cronbach's alpha was used to determine internal consistency, and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was estimated for test-retest reliability. POP-SS validity was assessed by using the Spearman rank correlation and Kruskal-Wallis analyses. The underlying scale structure was determined by exploratory factor analysis. Results The POP-SS scale had high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.705) and test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.981; p < 0.001). Among groups, there was statistically significant differences in POP-SS scores. POP-SS scores were also significantly correlated with POPDI-6 (r = 0.830), CRADI-8 (r = 0.525), UDI-6 (r = 0.385), PFDI-20 (r = 0.752), and POPIQ-7 (r = 0.690) (p < 0.001). Two factors were identified by exploratory factor analysis. Conclusions The Turkish version of POP-SS is a valid and reliable tool for Turkish women with POP.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00192-016-3251-xen_US
dc.identifier.endpage1222en_US
dc.identifier.issn0937-3462
dc.identifier.issn1433-3023
dc.identifier.issue8en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage1217en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-016-3251-x
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12684/5283
dc.identifier.volume28en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000405791100015en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringer London Ltden_US
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Urogynecology Journalen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectPelvic organ prolapseen_US
dc.subjectPelvic Organ Prolapse Symptom Scoreen_US
dc.subjectReliabilityen_US
dc.subjectValidityen_US
dc.titleTurkish adaptation of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Symptom Score and its validity and reliabilityen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim Yok
İsim:
5283.pdf
Boyut:
287.48 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin / Full Text
İndir

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Makale Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu