Proteinuria in preeclampsia: is it important?

dc.contributor.authorÖzkara, Attila
dc.contributor.authorKaya, Aşkı Ellibeş
dc.contributor.authorBaşbuğ, Alper
dc.contributor.authorÖkten, Sabri Berkem
dc.contributor.authorDoğan, Ozan
dc.contributor.authorÇağlar, Mete
dc.contributor.authorKumru, Selahattin
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-30T23:31:31Z
dc.date.available2020-04-30T23:31:31Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.departmentDÜ, Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümüen_US
dc.descriptiondogan, ozan/0000-0002-0016-8749en_US
dc.descriptionWOS: 000438931800005en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed: 30084477en_US
dc.description.abstractObjectives: Our aim is to evaluate the laboratory results arid proteinuria levels of preeclamptic women arid their relationships to maternal and fetal outcomes. Material and methods: One hundred preeclamptic pregnant women who gave birth in our clinic between 2013 and 2015 were included in our study retrospectively. The data collected from the patients included gestational week, age, gravidity, parity, abortus history, blood pressure, biochemical parameters, delivery method, maternal hospitalization time, cesarean indication, complications, blood products required, plasmapheresis use and dialysis need. The details about the newborns were recorded retrospectively. The relationships between preeclampsia signs and maternal and neonatal outcomes were analyzed. The protein amounts were analyzed via 24-hour collected urine analyses and spot urine analyses. Results: A statistically significant positive correlation was observed between neonatal intensive care unit needs and proteinuria levels. Fetal growth restriction, respiratory distress syndrome and sepsis were observed as the level of proteinuria increased, but the result was not statistically significant. Eclampsia was observed only in patients with massive proteinuria, and it was statistically significant. An increase in cesarean sections, placental abruptions, antihypertensive drug needs and blood product replacement rates was observed as the amount of proteinuria increased in preeclamptic women, but the results were not statistically significant. Conclusions: The severity of preeclampsia cannot be determined by the level of proteinuria. However, when massive proteinuria is detected, the clinician should be more cautious about maternal and fetal complications.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5603/GP.a2018.0044en_US
dc.identifier.endpage261en_US
dc.identifier.issn0017-0011
dc.identifier.issue5en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage256en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5603/GP.a2018.0044
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12684/4266
dc.identifier.volume89en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000438931800005en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherVia Medicaen_US
dc.relation.ispartofGinekologia Polskaen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectComplicationsen_US
dc.subjectpreeclampsiaen_US
dc.subjectproteinuriaen_US
dc.titleProteinuria in preeclampsia: is it important?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim
İsim:
4266.pdf
Boyut:
118.08 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin / Full Text