Transperineal versus transvaginal ultrasonographic evaluation of the cervix at each trimester in normal pregnant women

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorÖzdemir, İsmail
dc.contributor.authorDemirci, Fuat
dc.contributor.authorYücel, Oğuz
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-30T23:35:02Z
dc.date.available2020-04-30T23:35:02Z
dc.date.issued2005
dc.departmentDÜ, Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümüen_US
dc.descriptionWOS: 000231130300005en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed: 15904442en_US
dc.description.abstractAims: To compare transvaginal and transperineal ultrasonography in the assessment of cervical length and cervical changes in normal gravid patients at each trimester. Methods: Transperineal and transvaginal ultrasonographic cervical length was measured on 104 asymptomatic pregnant women between 10 and 14, 20-24, and 30-34 weeks' gestation and the presence of a funnel was also noted. The study used the McNemar chi(2) test to assess the difference between two methods in their ability to obtain a measurement, and the Pearson correlation coefficient to determine the relationship between the paired transperineal and transvaginal cervical lengths. Results: Cervical length measurements were obtained by transvaginal ultrasonography in all 104 patients and by transperineal ultrasonography in 101 patients (97.1%) (P = 0.1). By gestational age, the greatest length discrepancy (2.8 mm) between the two ultrasonographic methods was found at 10-14 weeks (P < 0.001). At 20-24 and 30-34 weeks' gestation, the mean length differences were less than 1 mm (P < 0.01 and P = 0.337, respectively). Cervical funnelling was observed in 16 patients by both methods, whereas in two patients from the 20-24 week gestational age group, funnelling was observed by transvaginal ultrasonography and not by transperineal ultrasonography. Conclusions: Cervical length measurements by transperineal ultrasonography show good correlation with transvaginal ultrasonographic measurements and it is a satisfactory alternative to a transvaginal evaluation of the cervix throughout pregnancy.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1479-828X.2005.00378.xen_US
dc.identifier.endpage194en_US
dc.identifier.issn0004-8666
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage191en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1479-828X.2005.00378.x
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12684/5261
dc.identifier.volume45en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000231130300005en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishingen_US
dc.relation.ispartofAustralian & New Zealand Journal Of Obstetrics & Gynaecologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectcervical lengthen_US
dc.subjecttransperinealen_US
dc.subjecttransvaginalen_US
dc.subjectultrasonographyen_US
dc.titleTransperineal versus transvaginal ultrasonographic evaluation of the cervix at each trimester in normal pregnant womenen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim Yok
İsim:
5261.pdf
Boyut:
108.3 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin / Full Text
İndir

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Makale Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu