Addition of parity to the risk of malignancy index score in evaluating adnexal masses

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorYavuzcan, Ali
dc.contributor.authorÇağlar, Mete
dc.contributor.authorÖzgü, Emre
dc.contributor.authorÜstün, Yusuf
dc.contributor.authorDilbaz, Serdar
dc.contributor.authorÖzdemir, İsmail
dc.contributor.authorKumru, Selahattin
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-30T22:39:00Z
dc.date.available2020-04-30T22:39:00Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.departmentDÜ, Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümüen_US
dc.descriptionKUMRU, Selahattin/0000-0001-6615-7666; Ozgu, Emre/0000-0002-8444-9694; Gungor, Tayfun/0000-0002-7869-9662en_US
dc.descriptionWOS: 000348753800015en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed: 25510694en_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: The aim of our study was to evaluate the individual contribution of parity when incorporated as another parameter into the four risk of malignancy indices (RMI 1-4) to differentiate noninvasive benign lesions from invasive malignant ovarian lesions. Materials and methods: After calculating RMI 1-4 for each patient included in this study, the resulting RMI scores were further multiplied by the parity score (P) of each patient to calculate the RMI parity (RMIP) score. Results: A cutoff value of 300 for RMIP 1 yielded 95.0% specificity, 97.4% negative predictive value (NPV), 88.5% sensitivity, and 79.3% positive predictive value (PPV) and performed better than RMI 1 in the preoperative diagnosis of invasive malignant lesions. RMIP 2 with a cutoff value of 400 yielded 95.0% specificity, 97.4% NPV, 88.5% sensitivity, and 79.3% PPV, and it also performed better than RMI 2. A cutoff value of 400 for RMIP 3 provided 97.5% specificity, 97.5% NPV, 88.5% sensitivity, and 88.5% PPV and performed better than RMI 3. However, a cutoff value of 400 for RMIP 4 provided 90.0% specificity, 97.3% NPV, 88.5% sensitivity, and 65.7% PPV but did not perform better than RMI 4 in the preoperative diagnosis of invasive malignant lesions. Conclusion: RMIP 1-3 scales were more reliable tools for the preoperative diagnosis of invasive adnexal masses compared with the traditional RMI 1-3 scales. Copyright (C) 2014, Taiwan Association of Obstetrics & Gynecology. Published by Elsevier Taiwan LLC. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.tjog.2014.08.003en_US
dc.identifier.endpage522en_US
dc.identifier.issn1028-4559
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage518en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjog.2014.08.003
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12684/2556
dc.identifier.volume53en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000348753800015en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Taiwanen_US
dc.relation.ispartofTaiwanese Journal Of Obstetrics & Gynecologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectadnexal lesionen_US
dc.subjectparityen_US
dc.subjectrisk of malignancy indexen_US
dc.titleAddition of parity to the risk of malignancy index score in evaluating adnexal massesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim
İsim:
2556.pdf
Boyut:
289.22 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin / Full Text
İndir

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Makale Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu