Relation of the Number of Parity to Left Ventricular Diastolic Function in Pregnancy

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

2017

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Excerpta Medica Inc-Elsevier Science Inc

Access Rights

info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess

Abstract

Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) has been relatively less studied than other cardiac changes during pregnancy. Previous studies revealed a mild diastolic deterioration during pregnancy. However, these studies did not evaluate the long-term effect of parity on left ventricular diastolic function. A comprehensive study evaluating the long-term effect of parity on diastolic function is required. A total of 710 women with various number of parity were evaluated through echocardiography to reveal the status of diastolic function. Echo cardiographic parameters were compared among the women by parity number and categorized accordingly: none, 0 to 4 and 4< parity (grand multiparous). In nulliparous group, 19 women (23.2%) had grade 1 LVDD, and only 2 women (2.4%) had grade 2 LVDD. In women with a parity number of 0 to 4, 209 women (38.3%) had grade 1 LVDD, and only 17 women (3.1%) had grade 2 LVDD. In grand multiparous group, only 2 women (2.4%) did not have LVDD, and 12 women (14.6%) had grade 2 LVDD. None of the subjects had grade 3 or grade 4 LVDD. According to hierarchical logistic regression analysis, any grade of LVDD and grade 2 LVDD had the highest rates at parity category of > 4 parity and that had 21 and 5.8 times higher than nulliparous group, respectively. In conclusion, according to the present study, grand multiparity but not multiparity, severely deteriorates left ventricular diastolic function. Further studies are warranted to evaluate the risk of gradual diastolic dysfunction after each pregnancy. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Description

Guvenc, Tolga Sinan/0000-0002-6738-266X; Keskin, Muhammed/0000-0002-4938-0097
WOS: 000405144700024
PubMed: 28479168

Keywords

Journal or Series

American Journal Of Cardiology

WoS Q Value

Q2

Scopus Q Value

Q1

Volume

120

Issue

1

Citation