A Comparison of Three Different Photoscreeners in Children

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorTeberik, Kuddusi
dc.contributor.authorEski, Mehmet Tahir
dc.contributor.authorKaya, Murat
dc.contributor.authorAnkaralı, Handan
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-30T22:38:38Z
dc.date.available2020-04-30T22:38:38Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.departmentDÜ, Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümüen_US
dc.descriptionAnkarali, Handan Camdeviren/0000-0002-3613-0523en_US
dc.descriptionWOS: 000445088200007en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed: 29809264en_US
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To compare the results obtained from three non-cycloplegic handheld photorefractometers with cycloplegic autorefractometry (Topcon KR-8100; Topcon Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) measurement in children. Methods: The refractive status of 238 eyes in 119 healthy children was assessed. The values acquired using photorefraction with the non-cycloplegic PlusoptiX A12 (Plusoptix GmbH, Nuremberg, Germany), Retinomax K-plus 3 (Righton, Tokyo, Japan), and Spot Vision Screener (Welch Allyn, Skaneateles Falls, NY) devices were compared with those obtained from the cycloplegic Topcon KR-8100. The agreement between the measurements was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient. Results: The mean age was 10.1 +/- 3.2 years (range: 6 to 17 years). The mean spherical value for the right eyes was 0.38 diopters (D) (range: -4.50 to 6.25 D) for the Plusoptix A12; 0.45 D (range: -4.50 to 6.25 D) for the Spot Vision Screener; -1.15 D (range: -8.75 to 6.50 D) for the Retinomax K-plus 3; and 0.62 (range: -4.50 to 6.00) for the Topcon KR-8100. The mean spherical equivalent value for the right eyes was 0.41 D (range: -4.50 to 7.90 D) for the Plusoptix A12; 0.18 D (range: -4.75 to 6.13 D) for the Spot Vision Screener; -1.30 D (range: -10.50 to 6.38 D) for the Retinomax K-plus 3; and 0.67 D (range: -4.00 to 6.00 D) for the Topcon KR-8100 (for the right eyes). Conclusions: The photorefractometer method was beneficial in the measurement of refractive errors of school-aged children. The PlusoptiX A12 photorefractometer method may eliminate the need for cycloplegia in the detection of refractive errors in children.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3928/01913913-20180405-03en_US
dc.identifier.endpage+en_US
dc.identifier.issn0191-3913
dc.identifier.issn1938-2405
dc.identifier.issue5en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage306en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3928/01913913-20180405-03
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12684/2337
dc.identifier.volume55en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000445088200007en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSlack Incen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal Of Pediatric Ophthalmology & Strabismusen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.titleA Comparison of Three Different Photoscreeners in Childrenen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim Yok
İsim:
2337.pdf
Boyut:
2.76 MB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin / Full Text
İndir

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Makale Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu