Should Cut-Off Values of the Risk of Malignancy Index be Changed for Evaluation of Adnexal Masses in Asian and Pacific Populations?
dc.contributor.author | Yavuzcan, Ali | |
dc.contributor.author | Çağlar, Mete | |
dc.contributor.author | Özgü, Emre | |
dc.contributor.author | Üstün, Yusuf | |
dc.contributor.author | Dilbaz, Serdar | |
dc.contributor.author | Özdemir, İsmail | |
dc.contributor.author | Kumru, Selahattin | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-04-30T23:31:56Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-04-30T23:31:56Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2013 | |
dc.department | DÜ, Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü | en_US |
dc.description | KUMRU, Selahattin/0000-0001-6615-7666; Ozgu, Emre/0000-0002-8444-9694; Gungor, Tayfun/0000-0002-7869-9662 | en_US |
dc.description | WOS: 000328273000086 | en_US |
dc.description | PubMed: 24175841 | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Background: The risk of malignancy index (RMI) for the evaluation of adnexal masses is a sensitive tool in certain populations. The best cut off value for RMI 1, 2 and 3 is 200. The cut off value of RMI-4 to differentiate benign from malignant lesions is 450. Our aim was to evaluate the efficiency of four different malignancy indexes (RMI1-4) in a homogeneous population. Materials and Methods: We evaluated a total of 153 non-pregnant women with adnexal masses who did not have a history of malignancy and who were above 18 years of age. Results: A cut-off value of 250 for RMI-1 provided 95.9% inter-observer agreement, yielding 95.9% specificity, 93.5% negative predictive value, 75.0% sensitivity and 82.8% positive predictive value. A cut-off value of 250 for RMI-1 showed high performance in preoperative diagnosis of invasive malignant lesions than cut-off value of 200 in our population. A cut-off value of 350 for RMI-2 provided 94.5% inter-observed agreement, yielding 94.2% specificity, 93.4% negative predictive value, 75.0% sensitivity and 77.4% positive predictive value. RMI-2 showed the higher performance when the cut-off value was set at 350 in our population. A cut-off value of 250 provided 95.2% inter-observer agreement, yielding 95.0% specificity, 93.2% negative predictive value, 75.0% sensitivity, and 88.0% positive predictive value. RMI-3 showed the highest performance to diagnose malignant adnexal masses when the cut-off value was set at 250. In our study, RMI-4 showed similar statistical performance when the cut-off value was set at 400 [(Kappa: 0.684/p=0.000), yielding 93.8% inter-observer agreement, 93.4% specificity, 93.4% negative predictive value, 75.0% sensitivity, and 75.0% negative predictive value]. Conclusions: We showed successful utilization of RMIs in preoperative differentiation of benign from malignant masses. Many studies conducted in Asian and Pacific countries have reported different cut-off values as was the case in our study. We think that it is difficult to determine universally accepted cut-off values for RMIs for common use around the globe. | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.7314/APJCP.2013.14.9.5455 | |
dc.identifier.endpage | 5459 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1513-7368 | |
dc.identifier.issue | 9 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusquality | Q3 | en_US |
dc.identifier.startpage | 5455 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2013.14.9.5455 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12684/4540 | |
dc.identifier.volume | 14 | en_US |
dc.identifier.wos | WOS:000328273000086 | en_US |
dc.identifier.wosquality | Q4 | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | Web of Science | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | PubMed | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | Scopus | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Asian Pacific Organization Cancer Prevention | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Asian Pacific Journal Of Cancer Prevention | en_US |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | Adnexal mass | en_US |
dc.subject | ovarian cancer | en_US |
dc.subject | risk of malignancy index | en_US |
dc.title | Should Cut-Off Values of the Risk of Malignancy Index be Changed for Evaluation of Adnexal Masses in Asian and Pacific Populations? | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |