Should Cut-Off Values of the Risk of Malignancy Index be Changed for Evaluation of Adnexal Masses in Asian and Pacific Populations?

dc.contributor.authorYavuzcan, Ali
dc.contributor.authorÇağlar, Mete
dc.contributor.authorÖzgü, Emre
dc.contributor.authorÜstün, Yusuf
dc.contributor.authorDilbaz, Serdar
dc.contributor.authorÖzdemir, İsmail
dc.contributor.authorKumru, Selahattin
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-30T23:31:56Z
dc.date.available2020-04-30T23:31:56Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.departmentDÜ, Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümüen_US
dc.descriptionKUMRU, Selahattin/0000-0001-6615-7666; Ozgu, Emre/0000-0002-8444-9694; Gungor, Tayfun/0000-0002-7869-9662en_US
dc.descriptionWOS: 000328273000086en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed: 24175841en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: The risk of malignancy index (RMI) for the evaluation of adnexal masses is a sensitive tool in certain populations. The best cut off value for RMI 1, 2 and 3 is 200. The cut off value of RMI-4 to differentiate benign from malignant lesions is 450. Our aim was to evaluate the efficiency of four different malignancy indexes (RMI1-4) in a homogeneous population. Materials and Methods: We evaluated a total of 153 non-pregnant women with adnexal masses who did not have a history of malignancy and who were above 18 years of age. Results: A cut-off value of 250 for RMI-1 provided 95.9% inter-observer agreement, yielding 95.9% specificity, 93.5% negative predictive value, 75.0% sensitivity and 82.8% positive predictive value. A cut-off value of 250 for RMI-1 showed high performance in preoperative diagnosis of invasive malignant lesions than cut-off value of 200 in our population. A cut-off value of 350 for RMI-2 provided 94.5% inter-observed agreement, yielding 94.2% specificity, 93.4% negative predictive value, 75.0% sensitivity and 77.4% positive predictive value. RMI-2 showed the higher performance when the cut-off value was set at 350 in our population. A cut-off value of 250 provided 95.2% inter-observer agreement, yielding 95.0% specificity, 93.2% negative predictive value, 75.0% sensitivity, and 88.0% positive predictive value. RMI-3 showed the highest performance to diagnose malignant adnexal masses when the cut-off value was set at 250. In our study, RMI-4 showed similar statistical performance when the cut-off value was set at 400 [(Kappa: 0.684/p=0.000), yielding 93.8% inter-observer agreement, 93.4% specificity, 93.4% negative predictive value, 75.0% sensitivity, and 75.0% negative predictive value]. Conclusions: We showed successful utilization of RMIs in preoperative differentiation of benign from malignant masses. Many studies conducted in Asian and Pacific countries have reported different cut-off values as was the case in our study. We think that it is difficult to determine universally accepted cut-off values for RMIs for common use around the globe.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.7314/APJCP.2013.14.9.5455
dc.identifier.endpage5459en_US
dc.identifier.issn1513-7368
dc.identifier.issue9en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage5455en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2013.14.9.5455
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12684/4540
dc.identifier.volume14en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000328273000086en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAsian Pacific Organization Cancer Preventionen_US
dc.relation.ispartofAsian Pacific Journal Of Cancer Preventionen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectAdnexal massen_US
dc.subjectovarian canceren_US
dc.subjectrisk of malignancy indexen_US
dc.titleShould Cut-Off Values of the Risk of Malignancy Index be Changed for Evaluation of Adnexal Masses in Asian and Pacific Populations?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar