Comparing the Long-Term Outcome of Uterosacral and Sacrospinous Ligament Suspension Surgeries in Apical Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorSukgen, Gökmen
dc.contributor.authorKaya, Aşkı Ellibeş
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-30T22:41:11Z
dc.date.available2020-04-30T22:41:11Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.departmentDÜ, Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümüen_US
dc.descriptionWOS: 000450536200020en_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: We aimed to compare the long-term outcomes of the sacrospinous ligament suspension (SSLS) and uterosacral ligament suspension (ULS) procedures used for the treatment of apical pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Methods: Fifty-two patients, diagnosed with apical POP, were included in this retrospective study. Twenty of these patients underwent The ULS procedure (Group 1), thirty-two patients (Group 2) were treated with bilateral SSLS. Operation type and time, objective and subjective cure rates, patient satisfaction rates and complications were obtained from hospital records at the operation time and 12-mounts, 36-mounts. Results: The objective cure rates were 80% of group 1, 78.1% of group 2 at 12-month follow-up and %70 of group 1, 71.8% of group 2 at 36-month follow-up; the subjective cure rates were defined as 100% of group 1, 87.4% of group 2 at 12-month follow-up and %100 of group 1, 84.3% of group 2 at 36-month follow-up (p>0.05). Very satisfied patients were significantly higher in the ULS group compared to the SSLS group (p=0.048) but when compared totally satisfied (very satisfied and greatly improved) and dissatisfied patients, there was no significant difference between groups (p>0.05). Conclusions: It was found that ULS and SSLS were not superior to each other according to success rates and patient's satisfaction in the comparison of two commonly used methods apical prolapse by vaginal approach.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.18521/ktd.462769en_US
dc.identifier.endpage386en_US
dc.identifier.issn1309-3878
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage381en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.18521/ktd.462769
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12684/3141
dc.identifier.volume10en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/Aen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizinen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherDuzce Univen_US
dc.relation.ispartofKonuralp Tıp Dergisi
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectApical Pelvic Organ Prolapseen_US
dc.subjectApical Prolapseen_US
dc.subjectUterosacral Ligament Suspensionen_US
dc.subjectSacrospinous Ligament Suspensionen_US
dc.subjectPelvic Organ Prolapseen_US
dc.titleComparing the Long-Term Outcome of Uterosacral and Sacrospinous Ligament Suspension Surgeries in Apical Pelvic Organ Prolapseen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim
İsim:
3141.pdf
Boyut:
553.74 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin / Full Text
İndir

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Konuralp Tip Dergisi Koleksiyonu
Makale Koleksiyonu
TR-Dizin İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu