Comparison of the three age estimation methods: Which is more reliable for Turkish children?

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorBüken, Bora
dc.contributor.authorErzengin, Ömer Utku
dc.contributor.authorBüken, Erhan
dc.contributor.authorŞafak, Alp Alper
dc.contributor.authorYazıcı, Burhan
dc.contributor.authorErkol, Zerrin
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-30T22:41:29Z
dc.date.available2020-04-30T22:41:29Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.departmentDÜ, Tıp Fakültesi, Dahili Tıp Bilimleri Bölümüen_US
dc.descriptionWOS: 000263392700017en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed: 19054636en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: Three atlases-the GOK, the Greulich-Pyle (GP), and the Tanner-Whitehouse (TW3)-are used frequently for age determination in Turkey, The purpose of this study was to evaluate the applicability of these three methods related to the skeletal age assessment for Turkish adolescents. Materials and methods: The conventional roentgenograms of the left hands and wrists, elbows. shoulders, and pelvises of 333 healthy Caucasian children (164 females, 169 males) who fit the study and the criteria of each atlas were obtained. The mean differences (+/- standard deviation [S.D.] in years) between the chronologic age (CA) and the skeletal age (BA), which were obtained by using each age estimation method, were calculated and tested using t-test. Results: For girls, the most accurate method was the TW3 (mean differences (d): -0.21 (p < 0.05)). following by the GP (d: 0.66 (p < 0.001), and the GOK (d: 2.99 (p < 0.001)). For boys, the most accurate method was the GP (d: 0.02 (p > 0.05)), followed by the TW3 (d: 0.18 (p < 0.05)) and GOK (d: 1.05 (p < 0.001)). Discussion and conclusions: Results show that the TW3 (for girls) and the GP (for boys) methods are more appropriate than the GOK atlas for estimating the BA. GOK could be used for boys aged 11-14 years but it should not be used for girls. (c) 2008 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipAbant Izzet Baysal UniversityAbant Izzet Baysal Universityen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was supported by the Abant Izzet Baysal University research fund.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.forsciint.2008.10.012en_US
dc.identifier.issn0379-0738
dc.identifier.issn1872-6283
dc.identifier.issue01.Maren_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2008.10.012
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12684/3196
dc.identifier.volume183en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000263392700017en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Ireland Ltden_US
dc.relation.ispartofForensic Science Internationalen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectBone developmenten_US
dc.subjectMethod comparisonen_US
dc.subjectTurkish childrenen_US
dc.titleComparison of the three age estimation methods: Which is more reliable for Turkish children?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim Yok
İsim:
3196.pdf
Boyut:
459.96 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin / Full Text
İndir

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Makale Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu