Critical issues in groin hernia management.

dc.contributor.authorGünal, Ömer
dc.contributor.authorGürleyik, Emin
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-30T13:32:16Z
dc.date.available2020-04-30T13:32:16Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.departmentDÜ, Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümüen_US
dc.descriptionPubMed ID: 19579200en_US
dc.description.abstractAccess to the posterior inguinal wall is a fundamental part of inguinal hernia repair. The approach to the inguinal canal may affect the course and outcome of the operation. The aim of this study is to compare posterior approach (PA) repair with the standard anterior approach (AA). The study included 91 low-risk unilateral primary inguinal hernia patients who randomly received AA repair or PA repair. Various outcome measures in both groups were compared, and the mean operating time was longer for the AA repair group. Intra-operative complications were the same in both groups. Postoperative complications were more frequent in the AA repair group. The at-rest mean visual analog score (VAS), 24 hours postoperatively, seemed to be higher in the AA repair group. AA patients were able to postoperatively walk sooner than PA patients. Inguinal hernia repair through a PA seems to be less painful, less debilitating, and more easily applicable than the AA. Such advantages may be the reasons to select it as a standard procedure of choice.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage133en_US
dc.identifier.issn1090-3941
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage129en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12684/201
dc.identifier.volume18en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofSurgical technology internationalen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.titleCritical issues in groin hernia management.en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar