Comparison of Ectopic Pregnancy Treatment Modalities: Experience from a Tertiary Center
dc.contributor.author | Albayrak, Mustafa | |
dc.contributor.author | Karataş, Ahmet | |
dc.contributor.author | Bıyık, İsmail | |
dc.contributor.author | Keskin, Fatih | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-04-30T22:41:16Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-04-30T22:41:16Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2013 | |
dc.department | DÜ, Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü | en_US |
dc.description | WOS: 000315620900008 | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Objectives: To review and analyze the outcomes of various treatment modalities in women with ectopic pregnancy (EP) in a tertiary center between January 2006 and February 2011 Design: Retrospective study Setting: Duzce University Hospital, Turkey Subjects and Methods: The medical records of 116 women diagnosed with EP were reviewed retrospectively. Women were grouped based on the treatment modality: Expectant (Group I), Medical treatment with methotrexate (Group II) and Surgical (salpingostomy and salpingectomy) (Group III). Demographic characteristics were analyzed and the success rates between the groups were compared. Intervention: None Main Outcome Measures: Success rates between groups based on treatment modality Results: Success rates for expectant, medical management with single dose of methotrexate, salpingostomy and salpingectomy were 66.7%, 79%, 92.7% and 100%, respectively. There was no difference between the success rates of laparoscopic salpingostomy and single dose methotrexate (p = 0.246). Salpingectomy was more successful compared to expectant and medical managements (p = 0.003 and p = 0.040, respectively). Conclusion: The highest success rate in EP was achieved by surgical treatment. However, expectant and medical treatment may eliminate the need for surgery in selected cases with low and / or decreasing initial beta-hCG levels. | en_US |
dc.identifier.endpage | 46 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0023-5776 | |
dc.identifier.issue | 1 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusquality | N/A | en_US |
dc.identifier.startpage | 41 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12684/3154 | |
dc.identifier.volume | 45 | en_US |
dc.identifier.wos | WOS:000315620900008 | en_US |
dc.identifier.wosquality | Q4 | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | Web of Science | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | Scopus | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Kuwait Medical Assoc | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Kuwait Medical Journal | en_US |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | ectopic pregnancy | en_US |
dc.subject | expectant management | en_US |
dc.subject | methotrexate therapy | en_US |
dc.subject | surgical treatment | en_US |
dc.title | Comparison of Ectopic Pregnancy Treatment Modalities: Experience from a Tertiary Center | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |