Impact of different crop rotations and tillage systems on weed infestation and productivity of bread wheat

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorShahzad, Muhammad
dc.contributor.authorFarooq, Muhammad
dc.contributor.authorJabran, Khawar
dc.contributor.authorHussain, Mubshar
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-30T23:18:25Z
dc.date.available2020-04-30T23:18:25Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.departmentDÜ, Ziraat Fakültesi, Bitki Koruma Bölümüen_US
dc.descriptionJabran, Khawar/0000-0001-8512-3330; Farooq, Muhammad/0000-0003-4368-9357;en_US
dc.descriptionWOS: 000383826400022en_US
dc.description.abstractCrop rotation and tillage systems have important implications for weed infestation and crop productivity. In this study, five tillage systems viz. zero tillage (ZT), conventional tillage (CT), deep tillage (DT), bed sowing (60/30 cm with four rows; BS1) and bed sowing (90/45 cm with six rows; BS2) were evaluated in five different crop rotations viz. fallow-wheat (FW), rice-wheat (RW), cotton-wheat (CW), mungbean-wheat (MW) and sorghum-wheat (SW) for their effect on weed infestation and productivity of bread wheat. Interaction between different tillage practices and cropping systems had significant effect on density and dry biomass of total, broadleaved and grass weeds, agronomic and yield-related traits, and grain yield of bread wheat. The un-disturbed soils (ZT) under fallow-wheat or mungbean-wheat rotations favoured the weed prevalence (a total weed dry biomass of 72.4-109.6 and 105.6-112.1 g m(-2) in first and second year, respectively). Contrary to this, the disturbed soils (CT, DT, BSI and BS2) had less weed infestation with either of the rotations (a total weed biomass of 0.4-7.1 and 1.1-5.4 g m(-2) in first and second year, respectively). Sorghum-wheat rotation had strong suppressive effect on weed infestation in all tillage systems. The impact of crop rotation was more visible during second year of experimentation. Bed sown wheat (BS1 and BS2) in mungbean-wheat rotation had the highest wheat grain yield (6.30-6.47 t ha(-1)) compared to other tillage systems in different crop rotation combinations. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipHigher Education Commission of PakistanHigher Education Commission of Pakistanen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipAuthors are grateful to Higher Education Commission of Pakistan for financial support to accomplish this research project.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.cropro.2016.07.019en_US
dc.identifier.endpage169en_US
dc.identifier.issn0261-2194
dc.identifier.issn1873-6904
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage161en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2016.07.019
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12684/3290
dc.identifier.volume89en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000383826400022en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Sci Ltden_US
dc.relation.ispartofCrop Protectionen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectTillage practicesen_US
dc.subjectCropping systemsen_US
dc.subjectWheaten_US
dc.subjectWeedsen_US
dc.subjectCrop rotationen_US
dc.titleImpact of different crop rotations and tillage systems on weed infestation and productivity of bread wheaten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim Yok
İsim:
3290.pdf
Boyut:
327.24 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin / Full Text
İndir

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Makale Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu