Evaluation of flood risk analyses with AHP, Kriging, and weighted sum models: example of capakcur, Yesilkoy, and Yamac microcatchments

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorMeral, Alperen
dc.contributor.authorEroglu, Engin
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-01T18:48:26Z
dc.date.available2021-12-01T18:48:26Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.department[Belirlenecek]en_US
dc.description.abstractThe present study aims to use the Bingol city center and agricultural plain as a base in future flood management plans and scenarios through flood modeling. In accordance with this purpose, the precipitation map of the catchment was prepared using the Kriging method by assigning values, with the Schreiber formula. Then, the slope, aspect, distance to the stream, land use, geology, soil, and precipitation maps were classified according to the analytical hierarchy process, and consistency indices and consistency ratios were calculated; thus, the factors affecting the flood were ranked as precipitation (CI 0.324), distance to the stream (CI 0.207), slope (CI 0.168), geology (CI 0.101), soil (CI 0.091), land use (CI 0.087), and aspect (CI 0.022). In the last step, consistency indices calculated by the AHP method were superposed on the weighted sum method, and then flood risk analysis was performed.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipTUBITAK 1002 Short Term R&D Funding ProgramTurkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Arastirma Kurumu (TUBITAK) [120O150]en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was organized from the project numbered 120O150 Landscape Characteristics Based Integrated Catchment Management Models: Example of Capakcur, Yesilkoy, Yamac Catchments in Bingol supported by TUBITAK 1002 Short Term R&D Funding Program.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10661-021-09282-w
dc.identifier.issn0167-6369
dc.identifier.issn1573-2959
dc.identifier.issue8en_US
dc.identifier.pmid34297216en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85111275092en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-021-09282-w
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12684/10531
dc.identifier.volume193en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000691490100007en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.relation.ispartofEnvironmental Monitoring And Assessmenten_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectFlood risken_US
dc.subjectAHP methoden_US
dc.subjectKrigingen_US
dc.subjectWeighted sumen_US
dc.subjectBingolen_US
dc.subjectNatural hazardsen_US
dc.subjectAnalytical Hierarchy Processen_US
dc.subjectClimate-Changeen_US
dc.subjectManagementen_US
dc.subjectVulnerabilityen_US
dc.subjectInformationen_US
dc.subjectBasinen_US
dc.subjectRiveren_US
dc.titleEvaluation of flood risk analyses with AHP, Kriging, and weighted sum models: example of capakcur, Yesilkoy, and Yamac microcatchmentsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim Yok
İsim:
10531.pdf
Boyut:
3.03 MB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin / Full Text
İndir

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu