Comparison of anterior colporrhaphy and repair with mesh for anterior vaginal wall prolapse

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorSukgen, Gökmen
dc.contributor.authorKaya, Aşkı Ellibeş
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-30T22:41:13Z
dc.date.available2020-04-30T22:41:13Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.departmentDÜ, Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümüen_US
dc.descriptionWOS: 000445937400035en_US
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The aim of this study was to compare anterior colporrhaphy versus mesh repair as surgical management of anterior vaginal prolapse at the 12-months follow-up. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study was performed on 69 patients who were diagnosed with symptomatic anterior vaginal compartment defect (Grade II or higher) according to the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) system. Thirty-six of these patients underwent conventional colporrhaphy anterior (Group 1), thirty-three patients (Group 2) were treated with anterior repair via mesh application. Operation type and duration, patient satisfaction and objective and subjective cure rates, postoperative pain score using visual analog scale (VAS) scores were recorded at 6-months and 12-months. Results: Patient satisfaction was significantly higher in Group 2. Objective cure rates at 12-months after surgery were found 87.8% in Group 2 and 61.1% in Group 1; the difference was statistically significant. Subjective cure rates were determined as 90.9% in group 2 and 69.4% in Group 1. The duration of operation was confirmed to be significantly longer in the mesh group than Group 1. No significant differences were found between one day after and one year after surgery, in comparisons of our groups regarding VAS score for pelvic pain. Conclusion: The anterior repair with mesh procedure seems to be advantageous due to the higher objective cure rate and patient satisfaction for the treatment of anterior compartment defects.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.17826/cumj.451065en_US
dc.identifier.endpage253en_US
dc.identifier.issn2602-3032
dc.identifier.issn2602-3040
dc.identifier.startpage248en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.17826/cumj.451065
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12684/3147
dc.identifier.volume43en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/Aen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizinen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherCukurova Univ, Fac Medicineen_US
dc.relation.ispartofCukurova Medical Journalen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectPelvic organ prolapseen_US
dc.subjectmeshen_US
dc.subjectmesh repairen_US
dc.subjectanterior colporrhaphyen_US
dc.subjectanterior vaginal wallen_US
dc.titleComparison of anterior colporrhaphy and repair with mesh for anterior vaginal wall prolapseen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim
İsim:
3147.pdf
Boyut:
257.73 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin / Full Text
İndir

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Makale Koleksiyonu
TR-Dizin İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu