Glenohumeral Joint Volume Measurement in Patients with Shoulder Instability: A 3D Volumetric Magnetic Resonance Arthrographic Study

dc.authoridUludag, Veysel/0000-0002-9911-5961
dc.authoridArican, Mehmet/0000-0002-0649-2339
dc.authoridGUCLU, DERYA/0000-0001-5332-2909;
dc.contributor.authorGueclue, Derya
dc.contributor.authorUnlu, Elif Nisa
dc.contributor.authorArican, Mehmet
dc.contributor.authorAcar, Oguzhan
dc.contributor.authorUludag, Veysel
dc.contributor.authorOgul, Hayri
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-11T20:47:43Z
dc.date.available2025-10-11T20:47:43Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.departmentDüzce Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractBackground and Objectives: This study aimed to compare capsular volume in patients with shoulder instability to that in control subjects without instability using magnetic resonance (MR) arthrography. The objective was to develop a reliable screening method with which to assess shoulder volume. Materials and Methods: In 21 patients with atraumatic shoulder instability and 21 controls, thin-slice 3D volumetric MR arthrography sequences were obtained. MR arthrography images were uploaded to 3D reconstruction, and 3D images were generated. From the 3D reconstructed images, volumetric measurements of rotator interval (RI), anterior and posterior capsular (AC, PC) recesses, biceps tendon sheath (BS), axillary recess (AR), and total glenohumeral joint (TGJ) were performed. Individuals with any extra-articular contrast leakage were also recorded. Results: A retrospective study analyzed a patient group of 21 individuals with shoulder instability (mean age 29.52 +/- 12.83 years) and a control group of 21 individuals without instability (mean age 35.71 +/- 12.77 years). No statistically significant differences were identified between the groups with regard to age, gender, or side distribution. The mean total joint volume was significantly higher in the instability group (29.85 +/- 6.40 cm3) compared to the control group (23.15 +/- 3.48 cm3, p = 0.0001). Additionally, the mean volumes of the RI, AC, PC, BS, and AR were all significantly greater in the patient group compared to the control group. Conclusions: 3D volumetric MR arthrographic measurements of the shoulder joint capacity can provide valuable insights for clinical follow-up and guide surgical treatment decisions in cases of atraumatic shoulder instability.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/medicina60091508
dc.identifier.issn1010-660X
dc.identifier.issn1648-9144
dc.identifier.issue9en_US
dc.identifier.pmid39336549en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85205089931en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60091508
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12684/21544
dc.identifier.volume60en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001323823500001en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMdpien_US
dc.relation.ispartofMedicina-Lithuaniaen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.snmzKA_WOS_20250911
dc.subjectatraumatic shoulder instabilityen_US
dc.subjectshoulder capsuleen_US
dc.subjectjoint volumeen_US
dc.subjectMR arthrographyen_US
dc.titleGlenohumeral Joint Volume Measurement in Patients with Shoulder Instability: A 3D Volumetric Magnetic Resonance Arthrographic Studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar