Feasibility of basket technique compared to the office hysteroscopy to treat endometrial polyps in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorZeteroğlu, Şahin
dc.contributor.authorKaya, Aşkı Ellibeş
dc.contributor.authorBaşbuğ, Alper
dc.contributor.authorÇakıroğlu, Yiğit
dc.contributor.authorDoğan, Ozan
dc.contributor.authorÇalışkan, Eray
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-30T13:32:29Z
dc.date.available2020-04-30T13:32:29Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.departmentDÜ, Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümüen_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: The authors aim to compare the results of office hysteroscopic basket polypectomy with operative hysteroscopy in endometrial polyps detected prior to in vitro fertilization (IVF). Material and Methods: Infertile patients, who underwent polypectomy before treatment, were analyzed retrospectively. Patients who underwent basket polypectomy as office hysteroscopy (Group 1, n=55) and hysteroscopic polypectomy (Group 2, n=49) were included in the study. Demographic data, operation time, success rates, and pregnancy rates after operation were compared between the two groups. Results: The mean operating time for Group 1 was 14.98 ±3.67 min, while that for Group 2 was 18.84±3.30 min (p=0.001). The success rates between the groups were similar (96.3% vs. 100%; p=0.652), without any major complications. Further, the biochemical (52.7% vs. 48.9%, OR 1.19; 95% CI: 0.55-2.59; p=0.696), clinical (43.6% vs. 40.8%, OR 1.16; 95% CI: 0.52-2.59; p=0.712), ongoing pregnancy (38.1% vs. 34.6%, OR 1.21; 95% CI: 0.52- 2.81; p=0.647), live births (34.5% vs. 28.6%, OR 1.3116; 95% CI:0.57-3.03; p=0.514), early spontaneous miscarriage (5.5% vs. 6.1, OR 0.88; 95% CI: 0.17-4.60; p=0.884) and spontaneous pregnancy (5.5 vs. 4.1, OR 0.745;%95 CI: 0.21-8.4; p=0.745) rates after polypectomy were observed to be similar in both the groups. Conclusion: Hysteroscopic basket polypectomy was not inferior to operative hysteroscopy regarding success rates and was found to be superior in terms of operating time in patients planning in vitro fertilization. Copyright © 2018 by Türkiye Klinikleri.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5336/jcog.2018-62152
dc.identifier.endpage139en_US
dc.identifier.issn1300-0306
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityN/Aen_US
dc.identifier.startpage132en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.5336/jcog.2018-62152
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12684/318
dc.identifier.volume28en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizinen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherOrtadogŸu Reklam Tanitim Yayincilik Turizm Egitim Insaat Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S.en_US
dc.relation.ispartofTurkiye Klinikleri Jinekoloji Obstetriken_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectBasket polypectomy; Endometrial polyps; In vitro fertilization (IVF); Office hysteroscopy; Polypectomyen_US
dc.titleFeasibility of basket technique compared to the office hysteroscopy to treat endometrial polyps in patients undergoing in vitro fertilizationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Makale Koleksiyonu
TR-Dizin İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu