COVID-19 infection rates among transportation and metal workers

dc.authoridöngel, ferit serkan/0000-0002-1762-910X
dc.authoridArbak, Peri/0000-0001-5730-0790
dc.authorwosidöngel, ferit serkan/D-8714-2015
dc.contributor.authorÖngel, Ferit Serkan
dc.contributor.authorGülenç, Nuran
dc.contributor.authorGürcanlı, Gürkan Emre
dc.contributor.authorArbak, Peri
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-26T11:54:09Z
dc.date.available2023-07-26T11:54:09Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.departmentDÜ, Tıp Fakültesi, Dahili Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü, Göğüs Hastalıkları Ana Bilim Dalıen_US
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the workers in the metal and transportation sectors in terms of COVID-19 infection frequency and to examine and establish links between infection frequency and the workplace working conditions. METHODS: A survey was prepared and conducted with a questionnaire prepared on the Google Form platform consisting of questions about the pandemic among the members of the All Transport Workers' and The United Metalworkers' Union in Turkey. RESULTS: The number of workers diagnosed with COVID-19 was 5.8% in the transportation sector and 2.8% in the metal sector, with a significant difference (p=0.036). The percentage of workers diagnosed with COVID-19 who worked at a physical proximity less than 2 m in the transportation sector was higher than those who worked in the metal sector (p=0.014). The proportion of those who stated that there were COVID-19 patients among their colleagues and working at a physical proximity less than 2 m at the workplace was 18.2% in the transportation and 10.6% in the metal sector, with a significant difference (p=0.003), those who took time off from work was 74%, but 28.5% successively (p<0.001). The share of those who thought that the protective equipment and/or measures were not sufficient during the pandemic was 41.9% in the transportation and 17.7% in the metal sector (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: The results emphasized that the characteristics of jobs, physical proximity during job hours, the use of protective equipment, and size of the workplaces should be considered as reasons for different infection risks in different sectors.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1590/1806-9282.20210918
dc.identifier.endpage355en_US
dc.identifier.issn1806-9282
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.pmid35442362en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85128793876en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityN/Aen_US
dc.identifier.startpage351en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9282.20210918
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12684/12741
dc.identifier.volume68en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000792944900014en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.institutionauthorArbak, Peri
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAssoc Medica Brasileiraen_US
dc.relation.ispartofRevista Da Associacao Medica Brasileiraen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.snmz$2023V1Guncelleme$en_US
dc.subjectCovid-19; Infection; Metal Workers; Transportationen_US
dc.titleCOVID-19 infection rates among transportation and metal workersen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim
İsim:
12741.pdf
Boyut:
187.15 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin / Full Text