Oceans and notions apart? An analysis of the US and European human resource development literature
Yükleniyor...
Dosyalar
Tarih
2008
Dergi Başlığı
Dergi ISSN
Cilt Başlığı
Yayıncı
Routledge Journals, Taylor & Francis Ltd
Erişim Hakkı
info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
Özet
A systematic content analysis of the human resource development (HRD) research articles published between 1990 and 2003 revealed notable differences in the underlying orientations and methodological approaches across the US and Europe. The US literature, in comparison to Europe, was observed to be more practice-oriented as reflected in a prescriptive and less critical approach to the study of human resource development (HRD). In terms of science orientation, the US literature was characterized to be more nomothetic and universalistic. While a subtle tendency towards becoming more prescriptive emerged in the US, over time the European literature had become less practice-oriented and more empiricist, although the latter trend did not reflect itself in the quantity but quality of quantitative research.
Açıklama
Poell, Rob/0000-0002-1954-3668; Wasti, S. Arzu/0000-0001-7809-5925
WOS: 000261674000002
WOS: 000261674000002
Anahtar Kelimeler
human resource development, research methods, scholarly publication
Kaynak
International Journal Of Human Resource Management
WoS Q Değeri
Q3
Scopus Q Değeri
Q1
Cilt
19
Sayı
12