Detection of the glenoid bare spot by non-arthrographic MR imaging, conventional MR arthrography, and 3D high-resolution T1-weighted VIBE MR arthrography: comparison with CT arthrography

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridOğul, Hayri/0000-0001-5989-3729
dc.contributor.authorÖzel, Mehmet Ali
dc.contributor.authorOğul, Hayri
dc.contributor.authorKöksal, Ali
dc.contributor.authorKöse, Mehmet
dc.contributor.authorTuncer, Kutsi
dc.contributor.authorEren, Suat
dc.contributor.authorKantarcı, Mecit
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-26T11:50:45Z
dc.date.available2023-07-26T11:50:45Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.departmentDÜ, Tıp Fakültesi, Dahili Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü, Radyoloji Ana Bilim Dalıen_US
dc.description.abstractObjectivesTo determine the diagnostic accuracy of non-arthrographic MR imaging, conventional MR arthrography, and 3D T1-weighted volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination (VIBE) MR arthrography sequences as compared with a CT arthrography in the diagnosis of glenoid bare spot.MethodsA retrospective study of 216 patients who underwent non-arthrographic MR imaging, conventional MR arthrography, VIBE MRI arthrography, and CT arthrogram between January 2011 and March 2022 was conducted. The diagnostic accuracy of non-arthrographic MR imaging, direct MR arthrography, and VIBE MRI arthrography in the detection of glenoid bare spot was compared with that of CT arthrography. All studies were reviewed by 2 MSK radiologists. Interobserver agreement for MR imaging and MR arthrographic findings was calculated.ResultsSixteen of 216 patients were excluded. Twenty-three of 200 shoulders had glenoid bare spot on CT arthrographic images. The glenoid bare spot was detected in 11 (47.8%) and 7 (30.4%) patients on conventional non-arthrographic MR images and in 18 (78.3%) and 16 (69.6%) patients on conventional MR arthrograms by observers 1 and 2, respectively. Both observers separately described the bare spot in 22 of 23 patients (95.7%) on 3D volumetric MR arthrograms. Interobserver variabilities were fair agreement for conventional non-arthrographic MR imaging (kappa = 0.35, p < 0.05), moderate agreement for conventional MR arthrogram (kappa = 0.50, p < 0.05), and near-perfect agreement for 3D volumetric MR arthrogram reading (kappa = 0.87, p < 0.05).ConclusionsA 3D high-resolution T1-weighted VIBE MR arthrography sequence may yield diagnostic performance that is comparable with that of CT arthrography in the diagnosis of glenoid bare spot.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00330-023-09443-0
dc.identifier.issn0938-7994
dc.identifier.issn1432-1084
dc.identifier.pmid36792853en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85148108504en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-023-09443-0
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12684/12421
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000937953400001en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.institutionauthorÖzel, Mehmet Ali; Oğul, Hayri
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean Radiologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.snmz$2023V1Guncelleme$en_US
dc.subjectGlenoid Cavity; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Arthrography; Tomographyen_US
dc.subjectBone Loss; Cartilage; Shoulder; Arthroscopy; Variants; Fossa; Areaen_US
dc.titleDetection of the glenoid bare spot by non-arthrographic MR imaging, conventional MR arthrography, and 3D high-resolution T1-weighted VIBE MR arthrography: comparison with CT arthrographyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim Yok
İsim:
12421.pdf
Boyut:
1.36 MB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin / Full Text
İndir

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu