Comparison of Early Versus Late Urethral Catheter Removal After Transurethral Resection of the Prostate in Patients with Benign Prostate Hyperplasia

dc.authoridBaba, Dursun/0000-0002-4779-6777;en_US
dc.authorwosidTekin, Ali/AAV-4667-2021en_US
dc.authorwosidBaba, Dursun/KMA-2498-2024en_US
dc.authorwosidYüksel, Alpaslan/JTT-5991-2023en_US
dc.contributor.authorSenoglu, Yusuf
dc.contributor.authorTekin, Ali
dc.contributor.authorYildirim, Olcay
dc.contributor.authorBaba, Dursun
dc.contributor.authorYuksel, Alpaslan
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-23T16:03:50Z
dc.date.available2024-08-23T16:03:50Z
dc.date.issued2023en_US
dc.departmentDüzce Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) is considered the standard in the surgical therapy of lower urinary tract symptoms related to benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH). However, there is no consensus on the timing of catheter removal. In this study, we aimed to compare the long-term effects of early and delayed removal of urethral catheters who underwent TURP.Methods: We prospectively analyzed a total of 91 patients who underwent TURP. Patients were randomized into two groups; the early (postop 1st-2nd days) and delayed (7th day) removal of the urethral catheter. After the surgery in 1, 3, and 6th months, we evaluated all patients regarding treatment success. In addition, international prostate symptom score (IPSS), quality of life (QoL), maximum flow rate, postvoid residual urine volume, and morbidities (hematuria, infection, urethral stricture, irritative symptoms, need for re-operation) were assessed at all visits.Results: After TURP, there was no statistical difference in urodynamic parameters, complications, IPSS, and QoL in both groups. Only in the 3rd-month, the maximum flow rate was higher in favor of the early group. Despite similar results in both groups, strictures occurred earlier in the early group than delayed group (respectively 1 and 3 months).Conclusions: These results suggest that there are no differences in efficacy and complications in groups of early or delayed urethral catheter removal after TURP. The results of long-term studies with large series should be awaited to reach a more definite conclusion. We have tried to shed light on a topic without consensus on the time of urethral catheterization after TURP.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.18521/ktd.1326542
dc.identifier.endpage352en_US
dc.identifier.issn1309-3878
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage347en_US
dc.identifier.trdizinid1203205en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.18521/ktd.1326542
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/tr/yayin/detay/1203205
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12684/13931
dc.identifier.volume15en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001099802900011en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizinen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherDuzce Univ, Fac Medicineen_US
dc.relation.ispartofKonuralp Tıp Dergisien_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectTransurethral Resection of the Prostate (TURP)en_US
dc.subjectUrethral Catheteren_US
dc.subjectBenign Prostatic Hyperplasiaen_US
dc.subjectStricturesen_US
dc.subjectCareen_US
dc.titleComparison of Early Versus Late Urethral Catheter Removal After Transurethral Resection of the Prostate in Patients with Benign Prostate Hyperplasiaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar