Lefort 1 Osteotomy Study of Maxillary Bone in Caprine Skull Model: Comparison of Different Osteotomy Techniques (Piezo Versus Lindemann Bur Versus Manual Chisel)

dc.authorscopusid56421700200en_US
dc.authorscopusid57193345863en_US
dc.authorscopusid25522593800en_US
dc.authorscopusid45561674600en_US
dc.authorscopusid58681241100en_US
dc.authorwosidserin, merdan/AAP-5073-2021en_US
dc.contributor.authorSerin, Merdan
dc.contributor.authorAltinel, Dincer
dc.contributor.authorToplu, Gaye
dc.contributor.authorRakici, Ibrahim Taskin
dc.contributor.authorToplu, Selcuk Goksel
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-23T16:04:18Z
dc.date.available2024-08-23T16:04:18Z
dc.date.issued2024en_US
dc.departmentDüzce Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractObjective:In this study, we aimed to compare the efficiency of different osteotomy techniques for Lefort 1 osteotomy in an experimental caprine skull model. Methods:Twelve caprine skulls were used for the study. Skulls were divided into 3 groups: (1) manual chisel group, (2) Lindemann bur group, and (3) piezo osteotomy group. Bilateral osteotomies were performed on each skull. Results were evaluated with three-dimensional computerized tomography scans and macroscopic observations of the mucosal tears and soft tissue. Results:The mean length of the bone gap in the manual, Lindemann, and piezo groups was 4.8 (+/- 0.7), 3.38 (+/- 1.49), and 1.39 (+/- 0.3) mm, respectively (P < 0.05). The mean number of comminuted fractures in the manual, Lindemann, and piezo groups was 5.5 (+/- 1.4), 1.6 (+/- 0.3), and 0.6 (+/- 0.5), respectively (P < 0.05). Mucosal tearing and soft tissue damage based on subjective inspection observations were negligible in the piezo technique. Soft tissue and mucosal damage were observed significantly more in the manual chisel osteotomy method compared with the other 2 techniques. Conclusion:We anticipate that piezo, which has started to be used in new application areas besides rhinoplasty, will continue to be used more widely, especially in reconstructive orthognathic surgery, due to the minimal damage it causes to tissues. With the long-term results, much healthier interpretations can be made.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/SCS.0000000000010309
dc.identifier.endpage1584en_US
dc.identifier.issn1049-2275
dc.identifier.issn1536-3732
dc.identifier.issue5en_US
dc.identifier.pmid38767364en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85197639215en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage1581en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000010309
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12684/14157
dc.identifier.volume35en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001261492000080en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/Aen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherLippincott Williams & Wilkinsen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Craniofacial Surgeryen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectLefort 1en_US
dc.subjectorthognathic surgeryen_US
dc.subjectosteotomyen_US
dc.subjectPiezoen_US
dc.subjectFort-I Osteotomyen_US
dc.subjectComplicationsen_US
dc.subjectPiezosurgeryen_US
dc.subjectAdvancementen_US
dc.subjectStabilityen_US
dc.subjectSurgeryen_US
dc.titleLefort 1 Osteotomy Study of Maxillary Bone in Caprine Skull Model: Comparison of Different Osteotomy Techniques (Piezo Versus Lindemann Bur Versus Manual Chisel)en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar