A randomized prospective comparison of the needleless mini-sling hammock and U-shape configurations for management of stress urinary incontinence: 60-month follow-up results

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authorscopusid57191228553en_US
dc.authorscopusid55956690300en_US
dc.authorscopusid57207937358en_US
dc.authorscopusid56581758300en_US
dc.contributor.authorDogan, Ozan
dc.contributor.authorBasbug, Alper
dc.contributor.authorEren, Ecem
dc.contributor.authorYassa, Murat
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-23T16:07:16Z
dc.date.available2024-08-23T16:07:16Z
dc.date.issued2024en_US
dc.departmentDüzce Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractObjectiveTo compare needleless mini-slings placed in a retropubic (U-shape) or trans-obturator (hammock-shape) configuration for treating stress urinary incontinence at 60th month.MethodsAll surgeries, conducted by a senior surgeon, involved objective and subjective assessments preoperatively and at 6, 12, 18, and 60 months postoperatively using cough-stress tests, ICIQ-SF, PGI-I, and a Likert scale.ResultsAfter 60 months, no significant differences were found in cure rates, mesh complications, or reinterventions between U-shaped and hammock-shaped groups. However, a significant decrease in cure rates was observed at 18 and 60 months in both groups. Notable differences in ICIQ-SF, Likert scale, and PGI-I scores were seen in the hammock-shaped group, while the U-shaped group showed differences in ICIQ-SF and PGI-I scores, but not in the Likert scale.ConclusionGiven the lack of significant differences, asserting the superiority of either retropubic (U-shape) or transobturatorly (hammock-shape) needleless mini-slings for treating stress urinary incontinence is challenging.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00404-024-07567-2
dc.identifier.issn0932-0067
dc.identifier.issn1432-0711
dc.identifier.pmid38861026en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85195635590en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-024-07567-2
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12684/14548
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001244800800001en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/Aen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringer Heidelbergen_US
dc.relation.ispartofArchives of Gynecology and Obstetricsen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectMidurethral slingen_US
dc.subjectMini-slingsen_US
dc.subjectStress urinary incontinenceen_US
dc.subjectTension-free vaginal tapeen_US
dc.subjectUrinary incontinenceen_US
dc.subjectSafetyen_US
dc.subjectTapeen_US
dc.subjectFixationen_US
dc.titleA randomized prospective comparison of the needleless mini-sling hammock and U-shape configurations for management of stress urinary incontinence: 60-month follow-up resultsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu