Determination of Anatolian Honeybee Biodiversity by Wing Characters

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authorscopusid36150926700en_US
dc.authorscopusid57224105146en_US
dc.authorscopusid57224449650en_US
dc.authorwosidbir, songül/JYC-5237-2024en_US
dc.contributor.authorKekecoglu, Meral
dc.contributor.authorBir, Songul
dc.contributor.authorAcar, Merve Kambur
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-23T16:04:02Z
dc.date.available2024-08-23T16:04:02Z
dc.date.issued2023en_US
dc.departmentDüzce Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractIn this study, we report that there were five different subspecies and three different ecotypes defined so far in Turkiye, which has a rich biodiversity in terms of honeybee subspecies. However, recently, it has been thought that the current biodiversity is in danger of extinction due to the commercial queen bee supply and the migratory beekeeping activities from a single source. This study uses the morphometric method to reveal the current status of honeybee biodiversity in Turkiye. For this purpose, a total of 3186 worker bees were studied by samplings from 19 different provinces to represent the honeybee races and ecotypes distributed in Turkiye. We made wing preparations and established 19 landmarks on the right forewings using the BAB BsPro200 program. The program automatically obtained the wing's metrics' angle, length, and index values via these 19 landmarks. We used Discriminant function analysis to determine intragroup and intergroup variations by taking the colony averages from data obtained from 31 morphological characters. Given the canonical discriminant function analysis and UPGMA dendrogram, Zonguldak, Duzce, Sakarya, Artvin, Ardahan, and Trabzon constituted a group, and Edirne, Kilis, Van, and Isparta formed a separate group. Hakkari, Kahramanmaras, and Ordu provinces formed a separate line together. On the other hand, the group centers of Kars and Kirklareli, two different ends of Turkiye, overlapped and formed a close line with Isparta. As a result, this study revealed that, although the protection measures taken at the local level effectively protected the honeybee biodiversity, these measures are insufficient.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.13102/sociobiology.v70i3.8333
dc.identifier.issn0361-6525
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85171732650en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.13102/sociobiology.v70i3.8333
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12684/14026
dc.identifier.volume70en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001070250900001en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniv Estadual Feira Santanaen_US
dc.relation.ispartofSociobiologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectApis mellifera L.en_US
dc.subjectbiodiversityen_US
dc.subjectmorphometryen_US
dc.subjectconservationen_US
dc.subjectTurkiyeen_US
dc.subjectApis-Mellifera L.en_US
dc.subjectMorphological Charactersen_US
dc.subjectMitochondrial-Dnaen_US
dc.subjectGenetic-Characterizationen_US
dc.subjectBee Populationsen_US
dc.subjectImportant Racesen_US
dc.subjectHymenopteraen_US
dc.subjectEcotypesen_US
dc.subjectPolymorphismsen_US
dc.subjectRestrictionen_US
dc.titleDetermination of Anatolian Honeybee Biodiversity by Wing Charactersen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu