Clinical Outcomes after En Bloc Resection of Periosteal Chondroma: A Retrospective Clinical Study

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorOkay, Erhan
dc.contributor.authorBaysal, Begümhan
dc.contributor.authorGümüştaş, Seyit Ali
dc.contributor.authorZenginkinet, Tülay
dc.contributor.authorToksöz, Ayse
dc.contributor.authorÖzkan, Korhan
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-10T20:20:56Z
dc.date.available2023-04-10T20:20:56Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.departmentRektörlük, Rektörlüğe Bağlı Birimler, Düzce Üniversitesi Dergilerien_US
dc.description.abstractAim: Periosteal chondroma is a rare chondroma that is difficult to differentiate. Its localization is similar to other surface periosteal lesions. These lesions have a wide distribution of age. Curettage, marginal excision, or en bloc resection are applied in the surgical treatment. En bloc resection is preferred to reduce recurrence. In this study, we aimed to share the experience of two orthopedic oncology centers in the differential diagnosis and treatment of periosteal chondroma. Material and Methods: Data from two clinics were analyzed retrospectively. Data were collected on demographic data (age, gender), clinical findings (pain, swelling, pressure-related symptom, duration of follow-up), radiological findings (size, bony invasion), pathology results (biopsy, excision), and postoperative complications (recurrence). Results: Fourteen patients were included in the study. En bloc resection was performed in all cases. The mean age of the patients was 31.5±16.5 (range, 8-58) years. 10 (71.4%) patients were male. The mean duration of symptoms was 6.6±4.8 (range, 0-18) months, and the mean follow-up was 46.7±39.6 (range, 6-132) months. Nine (64.3%) patients had pain. Six (42.9%) patientshadswelling.Onepatient(7.1%)hadapalpablemass.Therewasnocomplaint in 1 (7.1%) patient. One (7.1%) patient underwent biopsy. During the follow-up, no recurrence or complication was observed after en bloc resection. Conclusion: Imaging and histopathological findings of benign and malignant periosteal chondroid tumors may overlap, and accurate differential diagnosis is crucial in the treatment of these lesions. En bloc resection prevents recurrence during follow-up.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.18678/dtfd.939661
dc.identifier.endpage196en_US
dc.identifier.issn1307-671X
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage192en_US
dc.identifier.trdizinid498452en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://doi.org/10.18678/dtfd.939661
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/yayin/detay/498452
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12684/11479
dc.identifier.volume23en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizinen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofDüzce Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Ulusal Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectperiosteal chondromaen_US
dc.subjectEn-bloc resectionen_US
dc.subjectchondrosarcomaen_US
dc.subjectrecurrenceen_US
dc.titleClinical Outcomes after En Bloc Resection of Periosteal Chondroma: A Retrospective Clinical Studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim
İsim:
11479.pdf
Boyut:
502.87 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin / Full Text
İndir

Koleksiyon

TR-Dizin İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Düzce Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi Koleksiyonu