Stakeholder engagement for inclusive climate impact attribution studies

dc.authoridmichetti, melania/0000-0001-6649-1349
dc.authoridVeziroglu, Puren/0000-0002-0207-5829
dc.authoridAsaduzzaman, Muhammad/0000-0001-9048-7980
dc.authoridMuller, Laura/0000-0001-7466-6583
dc.authoridNkwasa, Albert/0000-0002-8685-8854
dc.authoridAkstinas, Vytautas/0000-0001-5752-4110;
dc.contributor.authorNkwasa, Albert
dc.contributor.authorMenke, Inga
dc.contributor.authorMurken, Lisa
dc.contributor.authorZaharia, Liliana
dc.contributor.authorIoana-Toroimac, Gabriela
dc.contributor.authorMueller, Laura
dc.contributor.authorMichetti, Melania
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-11T20:48:21Z
dc.date.available2025-10-11T20:48:21Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.departmentDüzce Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractSince its emergence in the 1990s, the science of attributing observed phenomena to human-induced and natural climate drivers has made remarkable progress. To ensure the relevance and uptake of climate impact attribution studies, scientists must effectively engage with stakeholders. This engagement allows stakeholders to pose key questions, which scientists can then substantiate with evidence evaluating the existence of causal links. Although significant advancements have been made in climate impact attribution science, much work remains to understand the varied requirements of different stakeholders for impact attribution findings. This perspective explores the usefulness of stakeholder engagement in climate impact attribution, the challenges it presents, and how it can be made more relevant for addressing societal questions. It advocates for prioritizing stakeholder involvement to achieve greater transparency, legitimacy, and practical application of findings. Such involvement can enhance the societal impact of attribution studies and support informed decision-making in the face of climate change.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipCOST Action PROCLIAS [CA19139]en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipCOST Actionen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipCOST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology)en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipFunding for this perspective was provided by COST Action CA19139 PROCLIAS (PROcess-based models for CLimate Impact Attribution across Sectors), supported by COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology; www.cost.eu). The authors are grateful for helpful comments by Sabine Undorf and the entire Inter-Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project (ISIMIP) community for the feedback on this work.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1088/2752-5295/ada8cc
dc.identifier.issn2752-5295
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105002289695en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityN/Aen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1088/2752-5295/ada8cc
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12684/21855
dc.identifier.volume4en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001402769700001en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/Aen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherIop Publishing Ltden_US
dc.relation.ispartofEnvironmental Research-Climateen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryDiğeren_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.snmzKA_WOS_20250911
dc.subjectclimate impact attributionen_US
dc.subjectclimate changeen_US
dc.subjectstakeholder engagementen_US
dc.subjectpublic inclusivenessen_US
dc.titleStakeholder engagement for inclusive climate impact attribution studiesen_US
dc.typeEditorialen_US

Dosyalar