Outdoor performance analysis of different PV panel types

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorElibol, Erdem
dc.contributor.authorÖzmen, Özge Tüzün
dc.contributor.authorTutkun, Nedim
dc.contributor.authorKöysal, Oğuz
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-30T23:20:26Z
dc.date.available2020-04-30T23:20:26Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.departmentDÜ, Mühendislik Fakültesi, Elektrik-Elektronik Mühendisliği Bölümüen_US
dc.descriptionWOS: 000389088900049en_US
dc.description.abstractPhotovoltaic (PV) panel efficiency has been tested in the laboratory at standard test conditions (STC) (25 degrees C, 1000 W/m(2) and AM:1.5). However, PV panels are used in different regions and climatic conditions quite different from STC. Due to that, panel efficiency is not observed same with manufacturer catalogue data. This study focus on outdoor testing of PV panels performances at literature, in addition, one-year results of mono-crystalline (2.35 kW), polycrystalline (2.64 kW) and amorphous silicon (2.40 kW) photovoltaic panels were analysed. These PV panels were placed on the roof of Duzce University Scientific and Technological Researches Application and Research Centre (DUBIT) in Duzce Province, in Turkey, one of the countries with the highest solar power potential in Europe and connected to power grid. Amounts of energy produced by the panels over a day, a month and a year as well as inverter efficiency and performance ratios were calculated. Performance ratios were found out as 73%, 81% and 91% for a-Si, polycrystalline and mono-crystalline PV panels, respectively. Panel efficiency was calculated as 4.79%, 11.36% and 13.26% in the same order. All results were compared with Previous studies. Statistical analysis was made to state relationship between efficiency and performance ratios of panel types, environmental temperature, panel temperature and amount of radiation. As a result of the statistical analysis, it was observed that temperature increase of 1 degrees C increased the efficiency of a-Si panels 0.029% and the efficiency of polycrystalline panels 0.033%, yet, decreased the efficiency of mono-crystalline panels 0.084%. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.rser.2016.09.051en_US
dc.identifier.endpage661en_US
dc.identifier.issn1364-0321
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage651en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.09.051
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12684/4007
dc.identifier.volume67en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000389088900049en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPergamon-Elsevier Science Ltden_US
dc.relation.ispartofRenewable & Sustainable Energy Reviewsen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectRenewable energyen_US
dc.subjectPV systemsen_US
dc.subjectPV panel typesen_US
dc.subjectYield factoren_US
dc.titleOutdoor performance analysis of different PV panel typesen_US
dc.typeReview Articleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim Yok
İsim:
4007.pdf
Boyut:
1.81 MB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin / Full Text
İndir

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Diğer Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu