Bond behavior investigation of ordinary concrete-rebar with hinged beam test and eccentric pull-out test
dc.authorid | Pul, Selim/0000-0002-7589-2248 | |
dc.authorid | Arslan, Mehmet Emin/0000-0002-7582-638X | |
dc.authorwosid | Pul, Selim/AAB-6408-2020 | |
dc.contributor.author | Arslan, Mehmet E. | |
dc.contributor.author | Pul, Selim | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-12-01T18:48:41Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-12-01T18:48:41Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
dc.department | [Belirlenecek] | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | In this study, bond behavior of ordinary concrete and rebars with different diameters and development length was investigated by using Hinged Beam Test (HBT) and Eccentric Pull-Out Test (EPT) comparatively. For this purpose, three different rebar size and development length depending on rebar diameter were chosen as variables. Three specimens were produced for each series of specimens and totally 54 specimens were tested. At the end of the tests it was observed that obtained results for both tests were quite similar. On the other hand, increased bar size, especially for the specimen with 14 mm bar size and 14 development length (lb), caused shear failure of test specimens. This situation infers that when bigger bar size and lb are used in such test, dimensions of test specimens should be chosen bigger and stirrups should be used for producing of test specimens to obtain more adequate result by preventing shear failure. Also, a nonlinear regression analysis was employed between HBT and EPT results. There was a high correlation between the EPT values, lb, rebar diameters and estimated theoretical HBT. In addition, at the end of the study an equation was suggested to estimate bond strength for HBT by using EPT results. | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.12989/cac.2020.26.6.587 | |
dc.identifier.endpage | 593 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1598-8198 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1598-818X | |
dc.identifier.issue | 6 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85101005438 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusquality | Q1 | en_US |
dc.identifier.startpage | 587 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.12989/cac.2020.26.6.587 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12684/10587 | |
dc.identifier.volume | 26 | en_US |
dc.identifier.wos | WOS:000603596800010 | en_US |
dc.identifier.wosquality | Q1 | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | Web of Science | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | Scopus | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Techno-Press | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Computers And Concrete | en_US |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | hinged beam test | en_US |
dc.subject | eccentric pull-out test | en_US |
dc.subject | concrete-rebar bond behavior | en_US |
dc.subject | development length | en_US |
dc.subject | nonlinear regression analysis | en_US |
dc.subject | High-Strength Concrete | en_US |
dc.subject | Aggregate Concrete | en_US |
dc.subject | Steel | en_US |
dc.subject | Bars | en_US |
dc.subject | Reinforcement | en_US |
dc.subject | Gfrp | en_US |
dc.title | Bond behavior investigation of ordinary concrete-rebar with hinged beam test and eccentric pull-out test | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |