Forest management issues of the southern United States and comparisons with Turkey

dc.contributor.authorBettinger, Pete
dc.contributor.authorSiry, Jacek
dc.contributor.authorCieszewski, Chris
dc.contributor.authorMerry, Krista L.
dc.contributor.authorZengin, Hayati
dc.contributor.authorYeşil, Ahmet
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-01T12:10:06Z
dc.date.available2020-05-01T12:10:06Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.departmentDÜ, Orman Fakültesi, Orman Mühendisliği Bölümüen_US
dc.descriptionBettinger, Pete/0000-0002-5454-3970; Cieszewski, Chris J./0000-0003-2842-4406en_US
dc.descriptionWOS: 000321226600010en_US
dc.description.abstractMost of the forest area in the southern United States has been cleared, regrown, purchased, and sold several times over the last 200 years, and forest management practices generally focus on wood production. Agricultural expansion, use, and the abandonment of land have been the major forces behind land use change, and now human population expansion is a major issue. The land tenure system of the United States has allowed individuals and companies to acquire, use, and sell land since the time of European colonization; thus, private ownership of land dominates the southern region. However, new private, corporate, nonindustrial entities have arisen in the last 20 years, mainly as a result of tax policies and changes in industrial business organizations. While in Turkey planning systems are centralized, these systems vary by landowner group in the southern United States. They range from those that are relatively absent (nonindustrial private landowners) to those that are very formal (national forests). The management of forests in the southern United States is also guided by a number of federal, state, and local policies rather than a single enterprise plan, and these policies affect the direction of both public and private forest management. Specifically with regard to public land, the mission and objectives of forestry are similar to those in Turkey, except when considering the needs of local citizens, which has been given greater emphasis in Turkish forest management and planning.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3906/tar-1202-23en_US
dc.identifier.endpage96en_US
dc.identifier.issn1300-011X
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage83en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3906/tar-1202-23
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12684/5997
dc.identifier.volume37en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000321226600010en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizinen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTubitak Scientific & Technical Research Council Turkeyen_US
dc.relation.ispartofTurkish Journal Of Agriculture And Forestryen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectCertificationen_US
dc.subjectland tenureen_US
dc.subjectmanagement objectivesen_US
dc.subjectprivate forest managementen_US
dc.subjectpublic forest managementen_US
dc.subjectsustainable forest managementen_US
dc.titleForest management issues of the southern United States and comparisons with Turkeyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim Yok
İsim:
5997.pdf
Boyut:
5.34 MB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin / Full Text