Biomass allocation and nutrient use efficiency in response to water stress: insight from experimental manipulation of balsam fir, concolor fir and white pine transplants

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorKoc, Ismail
dc.contributor.authorNzokou, Pascal
dc.contributor.authorCregg, Bert
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-01T18:48:04Z
dc.date.available2021-12-01T18:48:04Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.department[Belirlenecek]en_US
dc.description.abstractPlants under water stress alter their normal morphological and physiological processes. However, biomass allocation and nutrient use efficiency remain largely unknown under the interactive effect of irrigation and fertilization for many economically important conifer species. In this study, we compared biomass allocation and resources use efficiency of two-year-old (plug+1) containerized balsam fir [Abies balsamea (L) Mill.] 'Cooks' and concolor fir [Abies concolor (Gord. & Glend.) Lindl. Ex Hildebr.] 'Cibola', and one-year-old bare-root white pine [Pinus strobus L.] transplants grown under variable watering and fertilization conditions. In a controlled greenhouse setting, transplants were submitted to three irrigation levels and two fertilization rates in a factorial experimental design. Fir species, mainly concolor fir, had a greater capacity to utilize water resulting in decreased stem water potential than white pine, leading to increased aboveground growth and shoot-to-root (S/R) ratio. White pine transplants had a higher assimilatory nutrient efficiency, nutrient use efficiency (NUE), root weight ratio, and a lower nitrogen availability index than the two fir species, suggesting a better ability to tolerate water stress. The high rates of fertilization increased nutrient concentration more than growth, suggesting luxury consumption. These results indicate that white pine responds to drought stress by closing their stomata and decreasing their S/R ratio to limit physiological activities, while the two fir species exhibit increased water uptake via expanded fine root networks, increasing the NUE and S/R ratio. However, there was no clear trend for the irrigation and fertilization interaction for NUE for three species, making it difficult to generalize responses.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11056-021-09894-7
dc.identifier.issn0169-4286
dc.identifier.issn1573-5095
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85118917644en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-021-09894-7
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12684/10449
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000717925300001en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.relation.ispartofNew Forestsen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectAbies balsameaen_US
dc.subjectAbies concoloren_US
dc.subjectBiomass allocationen_US
dc.subjectNutrient use efficiencyen_US
dc.subjectPinus strobusen_US
dc.subjectWater stressen_US
dc.subjectDrought Stressen_US
dc.subjectAbies-Fraserien_US
dc.subjectDouglas-Firen_US
dc.subjectAdaptive Responsesen_US
dc.subjectTemperate Foresten_US
dc.subjectGrowth-Responseen_US
dc.subjectSeedlingsen_US
dc.subjectDynamicsen_US
dc.subjectPlantsen_US
dc.subjectSurvivalen_US
dc.titleBiomass allocation and nutrient use efficiency in response to water stress: insight from experimental manipulation of balsam fir, concolor fir and white pine transplantsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim Yok
İsim:
10449.pdf
Boyut:
1.15 MB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin / Full Text
İndir

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu