Fixed-Bearing versus Mobile-Bearing Unicondylar Knee Arthroplasty: Comparison of Patients with Similar Component and Mechanical Axis Alignment

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorErgün, Selim
dc.contributor.authorSaylık, Murat
dc.contributor.authorGüneş, Taner
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-10T20:21:02Z
dc.date.available2023-04-10T20:21:02Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.departmentRektörlük, Rektörlüğe Bağlı Birimler, Düzce Üniversitesi Dergilerien_US
dc.description.abstractAim: Unicondylar knee arthroplasty (UKA) is among the treatment options for patients with arthritis limited to one compartment of the knee. Fixed-bearing (FB) and mobile-bearing (MB) inserts are present. This study aimed to compare functional and clinical outcomes and revision rates of patients operated with FB-UKA and MB-UKA. Material and Methods: A total of 131 knees of 118 patients underwent cemented UKA, with a mean follow-up period of 80.58±31.31 months for FB-UKA and 97.66±29.24 months for MB-UKA. Clinical and functional evaluation was performed by the Knee Society Score (KSS) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) score, at the last follow-up visit. The factors affecting the radiological and functional results, complication, and revision rates were examined under three main titles; i) surgeon-related, ii) patient-related, and iii) component alignment-related factors. Results: There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of age, gender, body mass index, and side. Regarding the KSS scores, 9 (6.87%) knees were within acceptable limits, 62 (47.32%) knees were found to be good, and 60 (45.80%) knees were found to be excellent. No statistically significant difference was found between groups (p=0.497). Regarding the WOMAC scores, the MB-UKA group had significantly lower pain (p=0.049) and stiffness (p=0.014), but similar functional (p=0.591) scores. There was no statistically significant difference regarding revision rates (p=0.931). Conclusion: Similar clinical, functional, and radiological results and low revision rates were found. In terms of pain and joint stiffness, a significant difference was found between groups, in favor of MB-UKA.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.18678/dtfd.1182098
dc.identifier.endpage298en_US
dc.identifier.issn1307-671X
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage293en_US
dc.identifier.trdizinid1146378en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://doi.org/10.18678/dtfd.1182098
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/yayin/detay/1146378
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12684/11533
dc.identifier.volume24en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizinen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofDüzce Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Ulusal Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectkneeen_US
dc.subjectfixed-bearingen_US
dc.subjectmobile-bearingen_US
dc.subjectunicondylar Dizen_US
dc.subjectsabit-insörtlüen_US
dc.subjectmobil-insörtlüen_US
dc.subjectunikondileren_US
dc.titleFixed-Bearing versus Mobile-Bearing Unicondylar Knee Arthroplasty: Comparison of Patients with Similar Component and Mechanical Axis Alignmenten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim
İsim:
11533.pdf
Boyut:
477.81 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin / Full Text
İndir

Koleksiyon

TR-Dizin İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Düzce Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi Koleksiyonu