Kişisel Anlam Profili: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması
Küçük Resim Yok
Tarih
2016
Yazarlar
Dergi Başlığı
Dergi ISSN
Cilt Başlığı
Yayıncı
Sabri SİDEKLİ
Erişim Hakkı
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Özet
Frankl’a göre, anlam arayışı temel insan güdüsüdür ve birey yaşamda anlam bulduğu ölçüde hayata tutunur. Anlam kavramı insandan insana değişen, an’a özgü bir olgudur. Bu bağlamda bireyin yaşamında anlam kaynaklarının farkında olması anlamlı bir yaşam için gereklidir. Bireye özgü anlam kaynaklarını tespit etmek amacıyla geliştirilen ölçme araçları bulunmaktadır. Bunlardan biri Wong (1998) tarafından geliştirilen Kişisel Anlam Profilidir. Çalışmanın amacı Kişisel Anlam Profili Türkçe formunun faktör yapısını incelemektir. Araştırmanın örneklemini 304 üniversite öğrencisi oluşturmaktadır. Doğrulayıcı faktör analizi sonucunda 57 madde, yedi faktörden (başarı, ilişki, din, kendini-aşma, kendinikabul, yakınlık, adil muamele/algılanan adalet) oluşan ölçekten elde edilen uyum indekslerinin kabul edilebilir (x²=3170.41, sd=1518, p=.00, x²/ sd=2.08, RMSEA=.060, NFI= .87, NNFI= .92, CFI=.93, IFI=.93, SRMR=.07) olduğu görülmüştür. Kişisel Anlam Profili Türkçe formunun faktör yükleri .30 ile .69 arasındadır. Ölçekten elde edilen Cronbach alfa katsayısı .93’dür. Ölçekteki maddelerin ayırt ediciliği, madde analizi ve % 27’lik alt-üst grup karşılaştırmaları ile incelenmiştir. Sonuçlar dikkate alındığında Kişisel Anlam Profili Türkçe formunun geçerli ve güvenilir bir ölçme aracı olduğu söylenebilir
According to Frankl, the basic motive of human is to search for meaning. If a person finds meaning in life, he/she hold on life. Meaning as a concept changes day by day and it is special for the moment. In this context being aware of meaning sources in the person life is essential for meaningful life. There are instruments which developed in order to determine meaning source special fort hem person. One of these instruments is Personal Meaning Profile which was developed by Wong (1998). The aim of this study is to examine factor structure of the Turkish version of the Personal Meaning Profile. The sample of this study consisted of 304 university students. The results of confirmatory factor analysis showed that the 57 items, seven factors (achievement, relationship, religion, self- transcendence, selfacceptance, intimacy, fair treatment/perceived justice) scale has acceptable fit (x²=3170.41, df=1518, p=.00, x²/df=2.08, RMSEA=.060, NFI= .87, NNFI= .92, CFI=.93, IFI=.93, SRMR=.07). factor loadings of Turkish version of Personal Meaning Profile is rank between .30 and .69. Cronbach Alpha coefficient of the scale is .93. ıtem discrimination analysis of items in the scale was examined by item analysis and 27% sub and top group comparison method. According to findings it can be said that Turkish version of the Personal Meaning Profile is a valid and reliable measurement.
According to Frankl, the basic motive of human is to search for meaning. If a person finds meaning in life, he/she hold on life. Meaning as a concept changes day by day and it is special for the moment. In this context being aware of meaning sources in the person life is essential for meaningful life. There are instruments which developed in order to determine meaning source special fort hem person. One of these instruments is Personal Meaning Profile which was developed by Wong (1998). The aim of this study is to examine factor structure of the Turkish version of the Personal Meaning Profile. The sample of this study consisted of 304 university students. The results of confirmatory factor analysis showed that the 57 items, seven factors (achievement, relationship, religion, self- transcendence, selfacceptance, intimacy, fair treatment/perceived justice) scale has acceptable fit (x²=3170.41, df=1518, p=.00, x²/df=2.08, RMSEA=.060, NFI= .87, NNFI= .92, CFI=.93, IFI=.93, SRMR=.07). factor loadings of Turkish version of Personal Meaning Profile is rank between .30 and .69. Cronbach Alpha coefficient of the scale is .93. ıtem discrimination analysis of items in the scale was examined by item analysis and 27% sub and top group comparison method. According to findings it can be said that Turkish version of the Personal Meaning Profile is a valid and reliable measurement.
Açıklama
Anahtar Kelimeler
Kişisel Anlam Profili|Doğrulayıcı Faktör Analizi|Geçerlik|Güvenirlik|Personal Meaning Profile|Confirmatory Factor Analysis|Validity Reliability
Kaynak
Journal of Education, Theory and Practical Research
WoS Q Değeri
Scopus Q Değeri
Cilt
2
Sayı
1
