Entrepreneurship Studies in Turkiye: Where are We? Where Should We Go? Analysis of International Publications

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authorscopusid57486016000en_US
dc.authorscopusid56247043700en_US
dc.authorscopusid57205648735en_US
dc.contributor.authorBağiş, M.
dc.contributor.authorKurutkan, M.N.
dc.contributor.authorKryeziu, L.
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-23T16:07:34Z
dc.date.available2024-08-23T16:07:34Z
dc.date.issued2023en_US
dc.departmentDüzce Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractThis research aims to determine the contribution of publications in the context of Turkiye to the international entrepreneurship literature between 2005 and 2022. We examined 471 articles published in international journals in the Web of Science (WoS) Core Collection database using bibliometric analysis techniques. We analyzed the data with the software Biblioshiny+Bibliometrix, SciMAT, and VOSViewer. We used performance, theme and evolution, co-authorship, and document analysis in data analysis. Performance analysis findings show that the most publications were made in 2021, the journal with the most publications was sustainability, and the author with the most publications was Bakir, C. Theme and evolution analysis revealed that the motor themes were corporate entrepreneurship, gender and entrepreneurial intentions in the first period (2005-2014), while institutional entrepreneurship stood out as the niche theme. In the second period (2015-2022), "corporate entrepreneurship" and "performance" emerged as the motor themes, while the niche themes in this period were "Syrian refugees" and "entrepreneurial intentions. " Document analysis findings show that the most studied entrepreneurship types are gender, family, corporate, social, and small business, respectively. In addition, immigrant/refugee entrepreneurship is emerging as a new topic, while indigenous entrepreneurship, informal entrepreneurship, sustainable entrepreneurship, and religion entrepreneurship are the most minor studied topics in entrepreneurship. Evidence-based decision-making inputs were obtained for those holding the resource allocation authority in Turkiye. Policymakers and funders, as well as individuals and institutions that want to design the future in terms of resources, can benefit from the findings and analysis of this chapter. Turkiye, which ranks 26th in the world regarding entrepreneurship, must develop a policy based on data. © 2023 by Mehmet Bagis, Mehmet Nurullah Kurutkan and Liridon Kryeziu.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1108/978-1-83753-454-820231015
dc.identifier.endpage302en_US
dc.identifier.isbn978-183753454-8en_US
dc.identifier.isbn978-183753455-5en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85172264986en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityN/Aen_US
dc.identifier.startpage275en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-83753-454-820231015
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12684/14736
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherEmerald Group Publishing Ltd.en_US
dc.relation.ispartofEntrepreneurship Development in the Balkans: Perspective from Diverse Contextsen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryKitap Bölümü - Uluslararasıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectBibliometric analysisen_US
dc.subjectDocument analysisen_US
dc.subjectEntrepreneurshipen_US
dc.subjectPublication performanceen_US
dc.subjectTürkiyeen_US
dc.subjectWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.titleEntrepreneurship Studies in Turkiye: Where are We? Where Should We Go? Analysis of International Publicationsen_US
dc.typeBook Chapteren_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu