Altayistikte Bir Ünsüz Yarılması: *L/# Döngüsü
dc.contributor.author | Hazar, Mehmet | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-03-24T19:48:32Z | |
dc.date.available | 2025-03-24T19:48:32Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2023 | |
dc.department | Düzce Üniversitesi | |
dc.description.abstract | The development of this consonant l > ş and r > z has been sufficiently studied in sound equivalence studies, but *l1 < *l/# > l2 > r2 consonant splitting has not been given much attention. The development of this consonant l > ş and r > z has been sufficiently studied in sound equivalence studies, but *l1 < *l/# > l2 > r2 consonant splitting has not been given much attention. This sound splitting ø < s < ş (< j ) < ç < l1 < *l > l2 > r > z > s > ø shaped development that can be called “L Cycle” will bring the issue of LIR and SAZ back to the agenda of Turcology. The three most difficult to study number names are a characteristic example: Manç. (j)il+an “3”, Moğ. guraw “three” ~ Moğ. kur+ban ‘hree’ < AA *gil2+am > Çuv. weç(im) ‘three’ ~ vişşe, TT øüçø, *gul2am > *øulçam > *øøçam > Kor. san -not set- and Tuv. üj+en, Şor. üj+on ‘3 x 10’ -with diphthong- Kor. seol+eun ‘3 x 10’ -, Jap. san ?; -labial acration with instrumental- Hak. üz(öl+en) ‘three together’ -when the plural suffix loses its function, the suffix begins to accumulate-, Başk. ös, Karaçay-Balkar üc ??, Özb. uch, Tat. öç < üç, Kzk. üş ve Mac. hár+om ‘three’. As a result, the Altaic language theory is no longer a theory but a reality. | |
dc.description.abstract | The development of this consonant l > ş and r > z has been sufficiently studied in sound equivalence studies, but *l1 < *l/# > l2 > r2 consonant splitting has not been given much attention. The development of this consonant l > ş and r > z has been sufficiently studied in sound equivalence studies, but *l1 < *l/# > l2 > r2 consonant splitting has not been given much attention. This sound splitting ø < s < ş (< j ) < ç < l1 < *l > l2 > r > z > s > ø shaped development that can be called “L Cycle” will bring the issue of LIR and SAZ back to the agenda of Turcology. The three most difficult to study number names are a characteristic example: Manç. (j)il+an “3”, Moğ. guraw “three” ~ Moğ. kur+ban ‘hree’ < AA *gil2+am > Çuv. weç(im) ‘three’ ~ vişşe, TT øüçø, *gul2am > *øulçam > *øøçam > Kor. san -not set- and Tuv. üj+en, Şor. üj+on ‘3 x 10’ -with diphthong- Kor. seol+eun ‘3 x 10’ -, Jap. san ?; -labial acration with instrumental- Hak. üz(öl+en) ‘three together’ -when the plural suffix loses its function, the suffix begins to accumulate-, Başk. ös, Karaçay-Balkar üc ??, Özb. uch, Tat. öç < üç, Kzk. üş ve Mac. hár+om ‘three’. As a result, the Altaic language theory is no longer a theory but a reality. | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.35236/jots.1213972 | |
dc.identifier.endpage | 101 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2564-6400 | |
dc.identifier.issue | 1 | |
dc.identifier.startpage | 87 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.35236/jots.1213972 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12684/19001 | |
dc.identifier.volume | 7 | |
dc.language.iso | tr | |
dc.publisher | Erdem UÇAR | |
dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of Old Turkic Studies | |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Ulusal Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | |
dc.snmz | KA_DergiPark_20250324 | |
dc.subject | Altaic|Dolgan|Hungarian|consonant splitting|sigmatism|stirrup (= üzengi)|Altaic|Dolgan|Hungarian|consonant splitting|sigmatism|stirrup (= üzengi) | |
dc.title | Altayistikte Bir Ünsüz Yarılması: *L/# Döngüsü | |
dc.title.alternative | Form by Splitting the Cycle of *#L Consonant in Altaistics | |
dc.type | Article |