Supine and Prone Positions in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: Exploring Their Roles in Operative Efficiency and Patient Comfort

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorBaba, Dursun
dc.contributor.authorDilek, İsmail Eyüp
dc.contributor.authorEdiz, Emre
dc.contributor.authorAyvacık, Burak
dc.contributor.authorSenoglu, Yusuf
dc.contributor.authorTaşkıran, Arda Taşkın
dc.contributor.authorBalık, Ahmet Yıldırım
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-11T20:37:55Z
dc.date.available2025-10-11T20:37:55Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.departmentDüzce Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractAim: This study aimed to compare the effects of supine and prone positions during percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) on operative characteristics, patient out-comes and postoperative quality of recovery. Material and Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 78 patients who underwent PCNL for renal stones ≥2 cm at a single center between December 2022 and August 2024. Patients were divided into two groups: 41 treated in the mini-PCNL (mPCNL) supine position and 37 in the standart PCNL (sPCNL) prone position. Demographic data, operative time, hospital stay duration, complication rates, postoperative pain and analgesic requirements and quality of recovery scores (QoR) were compared. Treatment efficacy was assessed based on residual stone presence at 2 months postoperatively, with <2 mm considered stone-free. Results: Operative and access times were significantly shorter in the supine group and these patients had a reduced hospital stay. Quality of recovery improvement was more pronounced in the supine group with lower postoperative pain and analgesic requirements. Additionally, supine-positioned patients had a lower rate of residual stones compared to the prone group, suggesting enhanced treatment efficacy. Conclusion: The supine position in mPCNL offers advantages over the prone position in terms of operative efficiency, patient comfort and postoperative quality of recovery. Given these benefits the supine position may be a preferable choice for PCNL procedures. Further multicenter studies are recommended to validate these findings across broader patient populations.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.33631/sabd.1597277
dc.identifier.endpage287en_US
dc.identifier.issn2792-0542
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage282en_US
dc.identifier.trdizinid1313945en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.33631/sabd.1597277
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/tr/yayin/detay/1313945
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12684/20777
dc.identifier.volume15en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizinen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofSağlık bilimlerinde değer (Online)en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryDiğeren_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.snmzKA_TR_20250911
dc.subjectQuality of lifeen_US
dc.subjectprone positionen_US
dc.subjectsupine positionen_US
dc.subjectrenal stoneen_US
dc.subjectPercutaneous nephrolithotomyen_US
dc.subjectpostoperative outcomesen_US
dc.subjectquality of recoveryen_US
dc.titleSupine and Prone Positions in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: Exploring Their Roles in Operative Efficiency and Patient Comforten_US
dc.typeOtheren_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

TR-Dizin İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu