Yazar "Mermer, Ali" seçeneğine göre listele

Listeleniyor 1 - 2 / 2
  • Küçük Resim
    Öğe
    Çankırı İli Meralarının Floristik Özellikleri
    (2015) Şahin, Bilal; Aslan, Serdar; Ünal, Sabahaddin; Mutlu, Ziya; Mermer, Ali; Urla, Öztekin; Aydoğmuş, Osman
    Bu çalışmada, Çankırıda yapılan 41 adet mera vejetasyon etüdüne dayalı olarak il meralarının floristik özellikleri incelenmiştir. Vejetasyon etüdü tekerlek-nokta yöntemiyle yapılmıştır. Çalışma sonucunda 46 familya ve 187 cins içinde 327 adet tür tespit edilmiştir. Bu türlerin 38 tanesi buğdaygil, 56 tanesi baklagil, 47 tanesi papatyagil ve 141 tanesi de diğer familyalara aittir. Bitkiyle kaplı alan içerisinde buğdaygil, baklagil ve diğer familyaya ait türler sırayla %36.3, %12.8 ve %50.9 oranlarında bulunmaktadırlar. Yine meralarda en sık rastlanan familyalar sırasıyla Poaceae (3880), Lamiaceae (1676), Fabaceae (1367) ve Asteraceae (802)dir. En yüksek örtüşe sahip 20 türün 10u Poaceae, 1i Fabaceae ve 9u diğer familyalardandır. Meralardaki örnekleme başına ortalama tür sayısı 31.4 (standart sapma8)tür. Meralarda en çok rastlanan cinsler Astragalus (19), Trifolium (7), Centaurea (7), Alyssum (7), Trigonella (5), Ranunculus (5) ve Medicago (5)dur. Çankırı ilinin zengin flora yapısı mera alanlarının ıslahında kullanılabilecek yem bitkilerini içeren önemli bir bitki gen kaynağı olarak belirlenmiştir. Anahtar Kelimeler: Çankırı, mera, flora
  • Küçük Resim
    Öğe
    Rangeland Health, Condition and Biodiversity in Kırşehir Province
    (2019) Mutlu, Ziya; Ünal, Sabahaddin; Mermer, Ali; Urla, Öztekin; Şahin, Bilal; Aslan, Serdar
    Rangeland improvement and management have recently become more important that many new projects have been also initiated and conducted throughout Turkey. There is a great responsible for the provinces in the Central Anatolia Region on those implementation projects. In this framework, this study was designed that could contain vegetation surveys in representative sites for rangelands of Kırşehir province in 2008 year, at the same time their assessment, and conclusion were also performed too. The 36 rangeland sites were surveyed with the modified-loop method. The results of vegetation surveys were analyzed and determined rangeland condition and health classes for each sites. The vegetation cover was measured as 65.35%. The rates of decreasers and increasers cover were 11.54% and 35.26%, respectively. The studied sites numbers were one, 30 and 5 for good, fair, and poor conditions, respectively. The 35 sites of total sites were identified as fair and poor in condition based on the rangeland condition classes. On the other hand, 8 sites were found at healthy, 20 sites at risky and 8 sites at unhealthy in rangeland health categories. Total site numbers of the last two classes were 28.Rangeland biodiversity were calculated as 0.229 by Simpson’s index. Survey results showed that rangelandshave been overgrazed and seemed degradation. Firstly this trend should be stopped and secondly urgentmeasures should be implemented for restoration.