Yazar "Kaya, Aski Ellibes" seçeneğine göre listele
Listeleniyor 1 - 2 / 2
Sayfa Başına Sonuç
Sıralama seçenekleri
Öğe Early versus delayed removal of indwelling catheters in patients after elective cesarean section: a prospective randomized trial(Taylor & Francis Ltd, 2020) Basbug, Alper; Yuksel, Alpaslan; Kaya, Aski EllibesPurpose: We conducted a prospective randomized controlled trial to compare postoperative urinary catheter removal 2 versus 12?h after elective cesarean section in terms of irritative symptoms, first void time, incidence of urinary tract infection, postoperative mobilization time, and hospitalization time. Methods: A total of 134 women admitted to Duzce University Hospital for primary or recurrent elective cesarean section were randomized into two groups. A total of 62 women were enrolled in the early group, with indwelling catheter removal 2?h after cesarean section; 74 women were enrolled in the delayed group, with catheter removal 12?h after the cesarean section. The groups were prospectively compared in terms of irritative urinary symptoms, bacteriuria, hematuria, length of hospital stay, and mobilization time. Results: Urinary frequency (p?=?.04), microscopic hematuria incidence (p?=?.04), postoperative mobilization time (p?=?.01), and length of hospital stay (p?=?.009) were significantly lower in the early group than in the delayed group. There were no significant differences in terms of bacteruria, urinary retention, dysuria, and first postoperative voiding time. Conclusions: Early removal of urinary catheters after elective cesarean section is associated with reduced mobilization time and hospital stay.Öğe McDonald versus modified Shirodkar rescue cerclage in women with prolapsed fetal membranes(Taylor & Francis Ltd, 2020) Basbug, Alper; Bayrak, Mehmet; Dogan, Ozan; Kaya, Aski Ellibes; Goynumer, GokhanPurpose: We compared the efficacy of modified Shirodkar and McDonald rescue cerclage techniques in women with singleton pregnancies. Methods: The study sample included 47 women who presented at two tertiary hospitals in Turkey from 2008 to 2017 and underwent rescue cerclage due to cervical incompetence and cervical dilatation with fetal membranes prolapsed into the vagina. The outcomes were compared by cerclage technique used, Shirodkar or McDonald. Results: The McDonald cerclage was applied in 27 cases, and modified Shirodkar cerclage in 20 cases. A longer cerclage-to-birth interval (83.8 +/- 37.6 vs. 63.7 +/- 38.9 days) and later gestational age at delivery (33 vs. 31 weeks) were observed with the Shirodkar cerclage, although these differences were not statistically significant (p = .08 and .63, respectively). Both groups had similar delivery rates after 28, 32, and 37 weeks (p = .20, .15, and .25, respectively), whereas the modified Shirodkar technique resulted in a higher rate of live births although these differences were not statistically significant (85% vs. 63%, p = .09). Conclusion: The effects of the McDonald and modified Shirodkar cerclage procedures on prolonging pregnancy and improving the live birth rate were similar. Therefore, either technique can be applied to prevent neonatal loss due to advanced prematurity.