Yazar "Erdogan, Suat" seçeneğine göre listele

Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
  • Küçük Resim Yok
    Öğe
    The crime and punishment of non-Muslims for insulting the prophet
    (Ilahiyat Bilimleri Arastirma Vakfi, 2024) Erdogan, Suat
    In recent years, there has been a systematic increase in the number of verbal and actual insults against the holy places of Muslims. It is seen that a significant portion of these insulting and humiliating activities are directed against the Prophet Muhammad. No one has the right to engage in verbal or actual acts that hurt the honor and dignity of another person. Words and behaviors that violate personal rights are considered as crimes by all legal systems and criminal sanctions are envisaged. Since the offense of insulting the Prophet is not only a violation of personal rights, but also against the sacred values of all Muslims, it is more appropriate to consider it as a qualified crime. Since the crime of insulting the Prophet by a Muslim person is considered within the scope of apostasy, which is a separate type of crime, the study is limited to the crime of insulting the Prophet by non -Muslims. In the Islamic legal literature, the crime of insulting the Prophet by a non -Muslim is mostly dealt with outside the heading of uk & umacr;b & amacr;t within the framework of the dhimma contract/citizenship law. Detached works have also been written on the subject. Although there are different opinions, there is a general opinion that the penalty for the crime of insulting the Prophet is death. In this context, Hanafis, unlike other schools of fiqh, express their opinion that the crime of a non -Muslim citizen in this context will not harm the dhimmah contract, which is an important breakthrough on the subject. This article focuses on the bases of the death penalty for the crime of insulting the Prophet. In addition, the issue is discussed in terms of crime -punishment compatibility and a new approach to the punishment for the crime of insulting the Prophet is presented. In this context, it is revealed that the death penalty envisaged within the scope of the crime in question is incompatible with the crime -punishment compatibility.