Yazar "Akkurt, Mehmet Orçun" seçeneğine göre listele

Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
  • Küçük Resim
    Öğe
    Comparative Study of the Functional and Clinical Outcomes of Two Different Rotator Cuff Repair Techniques: Suture Anchor versus Transosseous Sharc-FT
    (2020) Karaduman, Zekeriya Okan; Arıcan, Mehmet; Turhal, Ozan; Turhan, Yalçın; Solak, Kazım; Akkurt, Mehmet Orçun; Cangür, Şengül
    Aim: The aim of the present study was to compare the functional and clinical outcomes of suture anchor andtransosseous Sharc-FT fixation options in mini-open repair of rotator cuff tears.Material and Methods: Between January 2010 and July 2016, 60 patients were operated on in the Orthopedics andTraumatology Clinics of Duzce University Hospital and Duzce State Hospital. Thirty patients in whom repair wasperformed with suture anchor (Group 1) and 30 patients in whom repair was performed with Transosseous Sharc-FT®(Group 2) were compared. Preoperative and postoperative shoulder ranges of motion, the visual analog scale scores,constant shoulder scores, Oxford shoulder scores, and Q-DASH shoulder scores were evaluated in Group 1 and Group 2patients.Results: A total of 62% of the participants were male and 38% were female. Gender distribution was homogeneous inboth groups (P=0.426). The mean age of the subjects was 57.35 ± 8.69 (41-78) years. No significant difference wasnoted between the groups in terms of mean age (P=0.232). On the basis of the post-hoc test results, the postoperativeconstant score was significantly higher in Group 2 compared with that in Group 1 (P<0.001).Conclusion: Rotator cuff repair using transosseous Sharc-FT fixation material provides tighter stability compared withsuture anchor and has superior functional, radiological, and pain scores. Furthermore, early rehabilitation is anotheradvantage of using Transosseous Sharc-FT in patients who prefer undergoing rotator cuff repair over other fixationoptions.