Arıcan, MehmetTurhan, Yalçın2024-12-282024-12-2820192146-443Xhttps://doi.org/10.33631/duzcesbed.584210https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/809728https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/duzcesbed/issue/48790/584210https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12684/17813Aim: To compare theclinical results after arthroscopic bankart repair with all-soft suture anchorand conventional metal anchor in physically active patients with traumaticanterior shoulder instability.Material and Methods: A total of 32 patients who met eligibility criteria were includedbetween 2016 and 2017 years, for arthroscopic bankart repair in a singleorthopedic department. The patients were examined into 2 groups as 17 underwentrepair with 1.8 mm all-suture anchor with 2 (5 metric) Hi-Fi® sutures (Y-knot®flex, Conmed, USA) (group 1), and 15 underwent repair with conventionaltitanium 3.5 mm Suture Anchors with two preloaded ultrabraid sutures (TWINFIX,Smith amp; Nephew) (group 2). Clinical and functional outcomes were assessedpretreatment, and final follow-up using the American shoulder and Elbowsurgeons (ASES) score and the ROWE score.Results: The meanASES score increased significantly in group 1 from 35.62±8.46 to 88.86±6.23(p=0.0001) and had increased significantly in group 2 from 41.15±14.51 to91.15±7.54 (p=0.0001). The mean ROWE score had increased significantly in group1 from 48.82±11.25 to 85.00±10.00 (p=0.0001) and had significantly increased ingroup 2 from 45.67±9.61 to 87.67±10.15 (p=0.0001). There was no significantdifference between the mean ASES scores of group 1 and group 2 (p=0.192,p=0.353), and also no significant difference between the mean ROWE scores ofgroup 1 and group 2 (p=0.404, p=0.461) at pretreatment and final follow-uprespectively.Conclusion: Arthroscopic bankart repair with an all-soft suture anchor demonstratedcomparable clinical and functional results as the conventional metal sutureanchor at short term follow-up.Amaç: Travmatikanterior omuz instabilitesi olan fiziksel olarak aktif hastalarda tüm yumuşaksütür ankor ve konvansiyonel metal ankor ile artroskopik bankart tamirininklinik ve fonksiyonel sonuçlarının kıyaslanması amaçlanmıştır.Gereç veYöntemler:2016-2017 yılları arasında, tek merkezde artroskopik bankart tamiri yapılan vedahil edilme kriterlerimize uyan 32 hasta değerlendirildi. 17 hastaya 1.8 mm(Y-knot® flex, Conmed, USA) tüm yumuşak sütür ankor (grup 1) ve 15 hastaya ise3.5 mm (TWINFIX, Smith amp; Nephew) konvansiyonel metal ankor (grup 2)uygulandı. Klinik ve fonksiyonel sonuçlar tedaviden hemen önce ve son takipteAmerikan omuz ve Dirsek cerrahları (ASES) skoru ve ROWE skoru iledeğerlendirildi. Bulgular: Ortalama ASESskoru grup 1’de 35.62±8.46'dan 88.86±6.23'e (p=0.0001) ve grup 2’de ise41.15±14.51’den 91.15±7.54’e (p=0.0001) artmıştır. Ortalama ROWE skoru da grup1’de 48.82±11.25'ten 85.00±10.00'a (p=0.0001) ve grup 2’de ise 45.67±9.61’den87.67±10.15’e (p=0.0001) yükseldi. Grup 1 ve grup 2’nin tedavi öncesi ve sontakibinde ortalama ASES ve ROWE skorlarında fark yoktur (p=0.192, p=0.353 ve p=0.404,p=0.461).Sonuç: Tüm yumuşaksütür ankor ile artroskopik bankart tamiri, kısa süreli takipte konvansiyonelmetal sütür ankor ile karşılaştırılabilir klinik ve fonksiyonel sonuçlargöstermiştir.en10.33631/duzcesbed.584210info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessOmuz eklemiartroskopik cerrahi prosedürShoulder jointarthroscopic surgical procedureArticle93139144DergiPark: 584210